Perbandingan Topik Integer Antara KSSM dan Kurikulum Cambridge: Analisis Contoh dan Latihan
Abstract
Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM) Matematik dan kurikulum Cambridge Lower Secondary Mathematics mempunyai persamaan dari segi pelaksanaan kurikulum iaitu, mengamalkan proses pembelajaran dan pengajaran matematik berasaskan buku teks. Kajian tinjauan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis contoh dan latihan bagi topik Integer antara dua kurikulum tersebut. Penyelidikan ini menggunakan buku teks Dual Language Program KSSM Mathematics Form 1 dan buku teks Cambridge Checkpoint Mathematics Stage 7, 8 dan 9 sebagai sampel kajian. Data kajian ini dikumpulkan secara kualitatif dan dianalisis secara kuantitatif dengan kaedah deskriptif. Data analisis bilangan soalan Integer menunjukkan terdapat 21 contoh (27%) dan 58 latihan (73%) dalam KSSM manakala sejumlah 11 contoh (9%) dan 114 latihan (91%) dalam kurikulum Cambridge. Perbandingan peratusan bagi bilangan soalan berdasarkan aspek kontekstual dan aspek matematik menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang ketara antara KSSM dan kurikulum Cambridge. Hasil kajian ini membawa implikasi kepada perspektif guru dan murid terhadap contoh dan soalan Integer antara kurikulum yang berbeza. Implikasi kajian ini juga menunjukkan susunan contoh dan latihan Integer dalam buku teks KSSM perlu disemak semula supaya pembelajaran Integer merupakan proses yang berterusan. Maka, cadangan kajian lanjutan boleh dijalankan bagi meninjau perspektif guru terhadap penyusunan contoh dan latihan Integer dalam buku teks KSSM matematik.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Z. (2020). Comparison of Cambridge and Indonesian Secondary Mathematics Curricula: The Mapping of Learning Materials.
Bofferding, L. (2019). Understanding negative numbers. In Constructing Number (pp. 251-277). Springer, Cham.
Brehmer, D., Ryve, A., & Van Steenbrugge, H. (2016). Problem solving in Swedish mathematics textbooks for upper secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 577-593.
Byrd, G., Byrd, L., & Pearce, C. (2012). Cambridge Checkpoint Mathematics Coursebook 7. Cambridge University Press.
Byrd, G., Byrd, L., & Pearce, C. (2013a). Cambridge Checkpoint Mathematics Coursebook 8. Cambridge University Press.
Byrd, G., Byrd, L., & Pearce, C. (2013b). Cambridge Checkpoint Mathematics Coursebook. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge Assessment International Education [CIE]. (2019). Cambridge Lower Secondary Mathematics Curriculum Outline. https://www.Cambridgeinternational.org/Images/80607-Cambridge-lower-secondary-mathscurriculum-outline.pdf
Cambridge Assessment International Education [CIE]. (2021). Cambridge Lower Secondary Brochure. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/607719-cambridge-lower-secondary-brochure.pdf
Cheng, J. W., & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). Analisis domain kognitif bagi latihan dalam buku teks matematik Tahun 6. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), 116- 126. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i11.549.
Fatmahanik, U. (2018). Penelusuran Miskonsepsi Operasi Bilangan Bulat dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Mahasiswa PGMI dengan Menggunakan Cri (Certainty of Respon Index). Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(1), 167-187. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v16i1.1201
Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: A five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849
Ho, H. (2018). The characteristics of writing examples in the textbook of mathematics in China and Germany compare research: Take the fourth grade as an example [Master dissertation, Guizhou Normal University]. CNKI. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10663-018836564.nh.html
Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13625.199-222
Idris, N. (2005). Pedagogi dalam pendidikan matematik. Utusan Publications.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia [KPM]. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 1. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia [KPM]. (2022, Mei 22). Pentaksiran Dalam Bilik Darjah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/en/soalan-lazim-menu/kurikulum/kurikulum
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754
Lim, C. Y., & Rosli, R. (2021). Analisis Contoh dan Latihan bagi Topik Penambahan dan Penolakan dalam Buku Teks Matematik SJKC. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), 254-270. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.1008
Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research, 28(4), 587-604.
Ooi, S. H., Yong, K. Y. & Ng, S. H. (2016). Dual Language Program KSSM Mathematics Form 1. Selangor: Penerbitan Pelangi Sdn. Bhd.
Pei, L., Shang, J., & Ma, Y. (2016). The comparative study of exercises in two versions of mathematics textbooks for Chinese elementary schools: A case study of number, addition, and subtraction within 20. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 36(6), 68-75.
Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z., & Abidin, M. (2018). A comparative analysis on cognitive domain for the malaysian primary four textbook series. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1273-1286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82625
University of Cambridge International Examinations. (2011). Cambridge Secondary 1 Mathematics Teacher Guide. https://mrmannmaths.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/cs1-maths-teacher-guide-v2-2011.pdf
Wang, Y. C. (2017). The research on classroom exercises using in the primary mathematical textbook: To PEP as an example [Master dissertation, College of Education, Central China Normal University]. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10511-1017251751.nh.html
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. Cengage learning.
Yang, Y. 2019. A comparative study of the example design in mathematics textbooks in Chinese and Singapore junior high schools: Taking Shanghai Education Version and New Express Mathematics Used in Singapore as an example [Master dissertation, Hunan Normal University]. CNKI. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10542-1019672528.nh.html
