Analisis Perbandingan Kurikulum Matematik Tajuk Ruang Sekolah Rendah di Malaysia dan Finland

  • Nik Rafidah Nik Yusoff Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Roslinda Rosli Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Keywords: KSSR, Kurikulum, Sukatan dan geometri, Ruang Perbandingan

Abstract

Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) Matematik Tahun 3 hingga 6 dan kurikulum Matematik Gred 3 hingga 6 di Finland mempunyai persamaan dari segi menghasilkan pembelajaran ke arah positif perkembangan murid-murid. Kajian tinjauan ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti kandungan Matematik bagi tajuk ruang dalam bidang sukatan dan geometri yang terkandung dalam standard pembelajaran antara dua kurikulum negara tersebut. Penyelidikan ini menggunakan Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Semakan 2017 bagi Tahun 3 hingga 6 dan dokumen National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014, mata pelajaran Matematik bagi Gred 3 hingga 6 sebagai sampel kajian. Data kajian ini dikumpulkan secara kualitatif dan dianalisis secara kuantitatif. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan dari segi skop dan bilangan standard pembelajaran, yang mana DSKP Matematik mempunyai banyak kandungan pembelajaran yang ingin diterapkan kepada murid-murid dari tahun 3 hingga 6. Manakala persamaan kurikulum Malaysia dan Finland dapat dilihat dari segi pembelajaran berasaskan murid. Kedua-dua negara menerapkan pembelajaran sambil bermain. Selain itu, penemuan kajian ini menyerlahkan kepentingan perbandingan kurikulum merentas negara untuk meningkatkan pemahaman tentang perbezaan dalam peluang pembelajaran murid-murid merentas negara yang berbeza.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akta Pendidikan 1996 (Akta 550): Subseksyen 29A (1), (2), (3) dan (4)).

Bulut, M. (2007). Curriculum Reform in Turkey: A Case Of Primary School Mathematics Curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, And Technology Education 3(3): 203-212.

Finnish National Agency for Education / EDUFI (2022) Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Subcategory in Education system. https://www.oph.fi/en/education-and-qualifications/national-core-curriculum-basic-education.

Finnish National Agency for Education (2014/2016). Finnish National core curriculum for basic education. Helsinki. Pages 9-426.

Finnish National core curriculum for basic education 2014 (3rd ed. 2020). Finnish National Agency for Education.

Hemmi, K., Krzywacki, H., & Koljonen, T. (2018). Investigating Finnish teacher guides as a resource for mathematics teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(6), 911-928.

Hin, K. K. (2020). PISA 2018 and Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 2(3), 12-18.

Ibrahim, Z. B., & Othman, K. I. (2010). Comparative Study of Secondary Mathematics Curriculum Between Malaysia and Singapore. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 8, 351-355.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Lubis, S. A. (2013). Islamic Education in Indonesia and Malaysia (The Existence and Implementation until 20th century). Journal Analytica Islamica 2(2), 217-232.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Key components of a curriculum plan: Objectives, content, and learning experiences. Schooling 2(1), 1-4.

Matilainen, M. (2011). Finnish education model-pedagogical approach. Retrieved October 12, 2011.

Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement: Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.

Norouzi Larsari, V., & Wildová, R. (2022). A Qualitative Comparative Report on Five Educational Systems: Spain, Turkey, Finland, Czech Republic And Islamic Republic Of Iran. International Journal of Research 11(8),1-15.

Nurul-Awanis, A. W., Hazlina, A. H., Yoke-May, L., & Zariyawati, M. A. (2011, January). Malaysian education system reform: Educationists’ perspectives. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Science, Economics and Art 2011 (pp. 14-15).

Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 Database. http://www.OECD.org/PISA2018Database

Ong, E. T. (2022). Science Education in Malaysia. In Science Education in Countries Along the Belt & Road (pp. 277-295). Springer, Singapore.

Palsa, L., & Mertala, P. (2022). Disciplinary contextualization of transversal competence in Finnish local curricula: the case of multiliteracy, mathematics, and social studies. Education Inquiry, 13(2), 226-247.

Pehkonen, E., Ahtee, M., & Lavonen, J. (2007). How Finns Learn Mathematics and Science. BRILL.

Polikoff, M. S. (2022). Lessons for Improving Curriculum from the COVID–19 Pandemic.

Rusdin, N. M., & Ali, S. R. (2019). Amalan dan cabaran pelaksanaan pembelajaran abad ke-21. In International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Technology Management, pp. 87-105.

Samiee, A. A., Shahtalebi, B., & Abedi, A. (2022). A Comparative Study of Creativity Education in Primary Schools of England & Finland: Lessons for Iran. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education 5(2), 1813-1830.

Siregar, W. M. (2018). The Comparison of Education System in The World. In International Conference of ASEAN Prespective and Policy (ICAP) Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 239-250.

Ustun, U., & Eryilmaz, A. (2018). Analysis of Finnish Education System to Question the Reasons behind Finnish Success in PISA. Online Submission 2(2), 93-114.

Uljens, M., & Rajakaltio, H. (2017). National curriculum development as educational leadership: A discursive and non-affirmative approach. In Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and Didaktik (pp. 411-437). Springer, Cham.

Venäläinen, S., Saarinen, J., Johnson, P., Cantell, H., Jakobsson, G., Koivisto, P. & Viitala, M. (2020). Perspectives Along the OPS Journey: Evaluation of the 2014 Implementation of The Basics Of Pre-Primary And Basic Education Curricula.

Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2022). Analysis Of Algebraic Problems Intended for Elementary Graders in Finland, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, And Taiwan. Educational Studies, 48(1), 75-97.

Published
2022-07-29
How to Cite
Nik Yusoff, N. R. and Rosli, R. (2022) “Analisis Perbandingan Kurikulum Matematik Tajuk Ruang Sekolah Rendah di Malaysia dan Finland”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(7), p. e001632. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1632.
Section
Articles