Transforming Physics Content into Content Physics for Instruction through the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER)

  • Azlinah Ispal SMK Bugaya II, WDT 69, 91308, Semporna, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • Mohd. Zaki Ishak Faculty of Psychology and Education, University Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Keywords: Model of Educational, Reconstruction, Elementarization, Alternative conception

Abstract

This study discusses how to transform physics content into instructional content using the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER). The MER is a popular method of lesson design because it gives equal attention to the content of physics to be learned other than students’ cognitive, affective, and learning processes. This model is from the German-Didaktik tradition, which is influenced by constructivism and is nearly unknown in Malaysia. According to this perspective, knowledge is derived through human reconstruction, and every young learner has intuitive knowledge prior to entering a formal classroom. As a result, in order to meet students’ needs in a balanced manner, teachers must elementarize physics content and integrate it with students’ alternative conceptions. This study focused on energy concepts to determine how effective MER is. With the complexity and difficulty of the dual meaning of energy, physics teachers must devise efficient teaching techniques to bridge the gap between energy in everyday language and scientific concepts. Thus, the researchers evaluated 15 significant papers to determine scientists’ understanding of energy; interviewed 12 secondary school physics students to get their alternative conceptions; and re-analyzed 23 earlier studies on the same topic. This paper is exclusively on natural concepts and energy fundamentals, and it found physicists and students had a significant understanding gap. As a result, the contradiction in understanding of the energy concepts must be applied to the development of an energy lesson plan by narrowing the gap between physicists’ and students’ understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practices: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.

Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K. & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun, Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88, 683- 706.

Azlinah, I. (2016). Learning Progression of Energy in Secondary School Physics (Master Degree Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Sabah). Retrieved from http://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/17834/1/Learning%20progression%20of%20energy.pdf.

Azlinah, I. (2022). Conceptual Reconstruction of Energy Concepts Using the Model of Educational Reconstruction in The German Didaktik Tradition (PhD Thesis). Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Barak, J., Gorodetsky, M. & Chipman, D. (1997). Understanding of energy in biology, and vitalistic conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 21–30.

Bliss, J. & Ogborn, J. (1985). Children’s choices of uses of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 72(2), 195–203.

Boyes, E. & Stanisstreet, M. (1991). Misconceptions in first-year undergraduate science students about energy sources for living organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 209–213.

Bybee, R. W. (2014). Next generation science standards (NGSS) and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211-221.

Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson & P. Miller (eds.), Conceptual Development: Piaget’s Legacy, 293-326. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chabalengula, V. M., Sanders, M. & Mumba, F. (2012). Diagnosing students’ understanding of energy and its related concepts in biological context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 241-266.

Chai, T. Y., Wan, F., Shima, B., Ismayatim, Seng, Y. K., Ragavan, R. & Roslina, A. (2006). Form Four Physics Text Book. Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Constantinou, C. P. & Papadouris, N. (2012). Teaching and learning about energy in middle school: An argument for an epistemic approach. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 161-186.

Dawson-Tunik, T. L. (2006). Stage-like patterns in the development of conceptions of energy. In X. Liu & W. J. Boone (eds.), Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, 111-136.

Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5(1), 61-84.

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P. & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.

Duit, R. & Häußler, P. (1994). Learning and teaching energy. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (eds.). The Content of Science, 185-200. London: The Falmer Press.

Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning science: From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In: B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, 3-25.

Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.

Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school—empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19(2), 59–66.

Duit, R. (2014). Teaching and learning the physics energy concept. In Chen, R. F., Eisenkraft, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K., Nordine, J. & Scheff, A. (eds.). Teaching and Learning of Energy in K-12 Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 67-85.

Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M. & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction–A framework for improving teaching and learning science. In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe, 13-37. Brill Sense.

Duit, R., Komorek, M. & Wilbers, J. (1997). Studies on educational reconstruction of chaos theory. Research in Science Education, 27, 339–357.

Ellse, M. (1988). Transferring not transforming energy. School Science Review, 69(248), 427-37.

Fah, L. Y., Hoon, C. K., Munting, E. T. & Chong, C. A. (2012). Secondary school students’ energy literacy: Effect of gender and school location. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(7), 75-86.

Fensham, P. J. (2001). Science content as problematic—issues for research. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross & P. Reiska, Eds., Research in Science Education—Past, Present, and Future, 27-41. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Fetherston, T. (1999). Students’ constructs about energy and constructivist learning. Research in Science Education, 29(4), 515–525.

Goldring, H. & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26. Institute of Physics (IOP) Publishing Ltd.

Grusche, S. (2017). Students’ ideas about prismatic images: teaching experiments for an image-based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 981-1007.

Gyberg, P. & Lee, F. (2010). The construction of facts: Preconditions for meaning and teaching energy in Swedish classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1173-1189.

Kariotoglou, P. & Tselfes, V. (2000). Science curricula: epistemological, didactical and institutional approach. Physics Review, 31, 19-28.

Karpudewan, M. & Ponniah, J. (2016). Project-based learning: An approach to promote energy literacy among secondary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 229-237.

Kattmann, U. (2001). Aquatics, flyers, creepers and terrestrials – Students’ conceptions of animal classification. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 141–147.

Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H. & Komorek, M. (1996). Educational Reconstruction—Bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students’ conceptions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), St. Louis.

Kesidou, S. & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conception of the second law of thermodynamics: An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85-107.

Klette, K. (2007). Trends in research on teaching and learning in schools: Didactics meets classroom studies. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 147-160.

Komorek, M. & Duit, R (2004). The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequence in the domain of non-linear system. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 619-633.

Komorek, M. & Kattmann, U. (2008). The model of educational reconstruction. Four Decades of Research in Science Education–From Curriculum Development to Quality Improvement, 171-188.

Kruger, C., Palacio, D. & Summers, M. (1992). Surveys of English primary teachers’ conceptions of force, energy, and materials. Science Education, 76, 339-351.

Krummel, R., Sunal, D. W. & Sunal, C. S. (2007). Helping students reconstruct conceptions of thermodynamics: energy and heat. Science Activities, 44(3), 106-112.

Lay, Y. F., Khoo, C. H., Treagust, D. & Chandrasegaran, A. (2013). Assessing secondary school students’ understanding of the relevance of energy in their daily lives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 199-215.

Lee, H. S. & Liu, O. L. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Science Education, 94, 665-688.

Lijnse, P. (2000). Didactics of science: the forgotten dimension in science education research? In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (eds.) Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research (Buckingham: Open University Press), 308–326.

Lijnse, P. L. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Journal of Science Education, 74(1), 571–583.

Liu, X. & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental Growth in Students’ Concept of Energy: Analysis of Selected Items from the TIMSS Database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493-517.

Loverude, E. M., Kautz, H. C. & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Students understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137-148.

Mak, S. Y. & Young, K. (1987). Misconceptions in the teaching of heat. School Science Review, 68(244), 464-70.

Mann, M. F. (2003). Students' Use of Formal and Informal Knowledge about Energy and the Human Body (Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University). Retrieved from:https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/1917/14732_Mann, %20Michael%20Frank%202003.pdf? sequence=2. Retrieved on January 2017.

McComas, W. F. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies (eds.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Millar, R. (2014). Teaching about energy: From every day to scientific understandings. School Science Review, 96(354), 45-50.

Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J. & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162-188.

Nordine, J. (2016). What should students know about energy? In Nordine, J. (eds.). Teaching Energy Across the Sciences, K-12. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press, 17-38.

Nordine J., Krajcik, J. & Fortus, D. (2010). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670-690.

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R. & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

Rizaki, A. & Kokkatos, P. (2013). The use of history and philosophy of science as a core for socioconstructivist teaching approach of the concept of energy in primary education. Science and Education, 22(5), 1141-1165.

Sağlam-Arslan, A. & Kurnaz, M. A. (2009). Prospective physics teachers’ level of understanding energy, power and force concepts. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-18. The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.

Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919–934.

Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to Know about Energy in School and Society. London: Falmer.

Strike, K. A. & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology and Educational Theory and Practice, 176.

Svedholm, A. M. & Lindeman, M. (2013). Healing, mental energy in the physics classroom: Energy conceptions and trust in complementary and alternative medicine in grade 10–12 students. Science and Education, 22(3), 677-694.

Tan, S. Y. (1999). Alternative Frameworks of Energy of Form Four Students (Doctoral dissertation, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya).

Tobin, R. G., Crissman, S., Doubler, S., Gallagher, H., Goldstein, G., Lacy, S., Rogers, C. B., Schwartz, J. & Wagoner, P. (2012). Teaching teachers about energy: Lessons from an inquiry-based workshop for K-8 teachers. Journal Science Education Technology, 21, 631-639.

Trumper, R. (1997a). A survey of conceptions of energy of Israeli pre-service high school biology teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 31–46.

Trumper, R. (1997b). The need for change in elementary school teacher training: the case of the energy concept as an example. Educational Research, 39(2), 157-174.

Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. Handbook of Research On Science Teaching and Learning, 177, 210.

Warren, J. W. (1982). The nature of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 295-297.

Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternatives views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213-217.

Westbury, L., Hopmann, S. & Riquarts, K. (2000). Teaching as Reflective Practice. The German Didaktik Tradition (eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

White, R. T. (1994). Dimensions of content. In Peter J. F., Richard, F. G. & Richard, T. W., The content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to Its Teaching and Learning, 255-262, The Falmer Press.

Published
2022-08-29
How to Cite
Ispal, A. and Ishak, M. Z. (2022) “Transforming Physics Content into Content Physics for Instruction through the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER)”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(8), p. e001660. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v7i8.1660.
Section
Articles