A Brief Overview of Public Participation in Public Administration
Abstract
Public participation is often viewed as a cornerstone of democracy given that it allows for citizens to participate and play an active role in government decision making. The existing public participation scholarship tends to focus on the mechanisms, processes, and outcomes of public participation. The goal of this paper is to give a brief overview of public participation in public administration as the practice is commonly becoming a key responsibility in public agencies.
Downloads
References
Amsler, B. L. (2013) Local Government: The Legal Framework and Context for Voice in Making Public Participation Legal, Compiled by the Working Group on Legal Frameworks for Public Participation.
Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public administration review, 65(5), 547-558.
Buckwalter, N. D. (2012). Mandated democracy: Information, participation, and the prospects for public empowerment (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).
Dabney, U.N.B. (2013) Public Participation in Transportation Planning: How Does the Level of Engagement and Deliberation Affect Transportation Decisions in Virginia’s MPO? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University
Figueredo, J.C. (2005) Public Participation in Transportation: An Empirical Test for Authentic Participation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
Giering, S. (2011) Public Participation Strategies for Transit; A Synthesis of Transit Practice, Washington D.C: Transportation Research Board.
Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE) (2013) A Practical Guide to Successful Civic Engagement: A Tool for Building Trust Between Citizens and Government.
Kadir, N. A. (2015). Bureaucratizing Participation: Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Administrative Rules Governing Public Participation in the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).
Kaiser, E. J., Godschalk, D. R., & Chapin Jr, F. S. (1995) Urban Land Use Planning. University of Illinois: Urbana, IL.
Kasymova, J., & Gaynor, T. S. (2014). Effective Citizen Participation in Environmental Issues: What Can Local Governments Learn?. State and Local Government Review, 46(2), 138-145.
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. N. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 317-326.
Kulözü, N. (2014). Different Participant Groups, Different Success Definitions: An Exploratory Study in the Case of" Local Government and NGO Cooperation in a Participatory Democracy Project". Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic & Administrative Studies, 28(1).
Kweit, M.G and Kweit R.W. (1981) Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Leighninger, M. (2014) Want to Increase Trust in Government? Update Our Public Participation Laws, Public Administration Review. Vol. (N/A).
Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 63S-88S.
Nabatchi, T., Ertinger, E., & Leighninger, M. (2015). The future of public participation: Better design, better laws, better systems. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33(S1), S35-S44.
Pandey, S.K and Moynihan, D (2006), Bureaucratic Red Tape and Organizational Performance: Testing the Moderating Role of Culture and Political Support Organizations in Public Service Performance eds. Boyne, Meier, O’Toole Jr and Walker (pp. 130-151). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Pandey, S.K and Young, K. (2011) Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes? Public Administration Review. Nov/Dec.: 880-892.
Wang, X.H and Van, M.M. (2007) When Public Participation in Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions, Public Administration Review, 67(2): 265-278.