Keterlibatan Murid Sekolah Menengah Luar Bandar: Peranan Sokongan Ibu Bapa dan Guru

Elisa Gerit James; Shahlan Surat; Saemah Rahman

doi:10.47405/mjssh.v8i4.2175

Elisa Gerit James Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi Selangor Malaysia.
Shahlan Surat Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi Selangor Malaysia.
Saemah Rahman Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi Selangor, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i4.2175

Keywords: Keterlibatan murid, Sokongan ibu bapa, Sokongan guru, Sekolah menengah luar bandar

Abstract

Keterlibatan murid memainkan peranan penting dalam pembelajaran di sekolah di samping mempengaruhi perkembangan diri murid. Tujuan utama kajian ini dijalankan iaitu untuk mengenal pasti sokongan ibu bapa dan guru terhadap keterlibatan murid di lima buah sekolah menengah luar bandar daerah Subis. Kajian ini dijalankan dalam bentuk tinjauan. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data secara rawak terhadap 260 orang responden murid tingkatan 5 di daerah Subis. Cara pengumpulan data adalah menggunakan instrumen borang soal selidik. Untuk menganalisis frekuensi, peratus, min, dan sisihan piawaian analisis deskriptif telah digunakan. Secara keseluruhan dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap sokongan guru terhadap keterlibatan murid sekolah menengah luar bandar pada tahap yang tinggi (M=4.04, SP= 0.53). Namun tahap sokongan lain seperti tahap keterlibatan individu murid menunjukkan tahap yang sederhana tinggi iaitu ( M=3.77, SP=0.58) dan tahap sokongan ibu bapa (M=3.8, SP=0.52) pada tahap sederhana tinggi. Terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara sokongan ibu bapa dengan keterlibatan murid (r=0.580, p=0.0001) dan ini terbukti melalui analisis Korelasi Pearson yang telah dikaji. Kesimpulannya keterlibatan murid saling berhubung dengan sokongan ibu bapa dan guru. Diharapkan kajian ini dapat dijadikan sebagai sumber rujukan khususnya terhadap sekolah-sekolah menengah luar bandar, ibu bapa dan guru.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Aida Suraya Md. Yunus, & Rosnaini Mahmud (2018). Pengaruh Guru, Rakan Sebaya dan Sokongan Keluarga Terhadap Keterlibatan Matematik Dalam Kalangan Murid Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 8(1), 1-12.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daniel Ginting. (2021). Student Engagement, Factors,and Method Affecting Learning in English Language Teaching. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215-228. http// dx.doi.org/10.29408/ veles.5i2.3968.

Epstein, J. L. et al. (2009). School, Family and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action (2nd Edition), Corwin Press,

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Friedel, J. (2005). What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. In Moore K. A., Lippman L. H. (Eds.), School Engagement (pp. 305-321). New York: Springer.

Gay, L., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson International Edition.

Hanita Mohd Yusoff & Norzaini Azman (2018). Pencapaian Akademik Murid Lelaki dan Perempuan: Peranan Sokongan Pembelajaran dan Keterlibatan Murid. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(12), 257-287. https//doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.2.10

Irwan Fariza Sidik, Mohd Mahzan Awang, & Abd Razaq Ahmad, (2020). Keterlibatan Pelajar dan Hubungan dengan Kemahiran Insaniah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 45(1), 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2020-45.0ISI

Khairunnisa Kamarulzaman. (2019). Hubungan di Antara Konsep Kendiri dan Sokongan Ibu Bapa Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kolej Vokasional. BF Psychology Thesis, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI).

Knollmann, M., & Wild, E. (2007). Quality of Parental Support and Students’ Emotions during Homework: Moderating Effects of Students’ Motivational Orientations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

Lam, S. F. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The result of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77-94.

Manisah Mohd Ali & Noorfaziha Hassan. (2018). Defining Concepts of Students Engagements and Factors Contributing to Their Engagement in Schools. Creative Education, 9, 2161-2170. https//doi:org/10.4236/CE.2018.914157

Martin, A.J, & Marsh, H.W (2009). Akademik resilience and academic buoyancy Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 353-370.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.

McInercy, D.M (2010). The role of sociocultural factors in shaping student engagement in Hong Kong: An ethnic minority perspective. Paper presented at the Chair Professors: Public Lecture Series, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, China.

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M.J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal effects of teachers behavior and student egagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Pscyhology, 85, 571-581. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 00220663.85.4.571.

Willms, J.D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. PISA 2000.