Research Methodology Mastery for Conducting an Islamic Studies Undergraduate Final-Year Project at UiTM Shah Alam
Abstract
The acquisition of research methodology is a crucial competency typically attained by seasoned scholars in academia. However, it is necessary to assess the level of research methodology proficiency among undergraduate students to adequately prepare them for the completion of their final year project, which is a mandatory component for graduation. This study aimed to examine the mastery level of research methodology in preparation for conducting an undergraduate final-year project. The study included a sample of respondents (n=228) who were final-year students in Islamic studies at UiTM Shah Alam. An online questionnaire was employed as a tool for data collection, while IBM SPSS Statistics was used for data analysis. The data underwent analysis using descriptive statistics and the Friedman test. The descriptive statistics indicates “information management” (Good: 53.9 percent, Excellent: 32 percent) as the highest frequency of mastery level compared to “instrumentation procedure”, and “sampling technique” mastery level. The Friedman test indicates a significant difference in “information management” (mean rank: 2.56) which is better than “sampling technique” (mean rank: 1.66) and “instrumentation procedure” (mean rank: 1.77) with χ2(2)137.1, ρ<.05. This study suggests that there is a need for improvement in the aspects of research methodology, specifically in “sampling techniques” and “instrumentation procedures”, particularly among undergraduate students in the field of Islamic studies. This study proposes the implementation of effective pedagogical strategies and a comprehensive curriculum to enhance proficiency in research methodology for future academic pursuits.
Downloads
References
Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Deraney, P. (2018). Teaching research skills to undergraduate students using an Active Learning approach: A proposed model for preparatory-year students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 184-194.
Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092
Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76-89.
Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Sage Publications Ltd.
Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
Brickley, D., Burgess, M., & Noy, N. (2019, May 13). Google dataset search: Building a search engine for datasets in an open web ecosystem. In L. Liu, & R. White (Eds.), The world wide web conference (pp.1365-1375). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313685
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215-217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Hanimoğlu, E. (2019). The role of supervising in preparing undergraduate students to undertake postgraduate education at Cukurova University. Turkish Studies, 14(2), 431-450.
Kulczycki, E., Engels, T. C., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Dušková, M., Guns, R., R., Nowotniak, R., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G., Istenič Starčič, A., & Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116, 463-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0
Majid, U. (2018). Research fundamentals: Study design, population, and sample size. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology Journal, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.16
Mazhar, S. A., Anjum, R., Anwar, A. I., & Khan, A. A. (2021). Methods of data collection: A fundamental tool of research. Journal of Integrated Community Health, 10(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.24321/2319.9113.202101
Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation Publishing.
Nind, M., & Lewthwaite, S. (2018). Methods that teach: developing pedagogic research methods, developing pedagogy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(4), 398-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1427057
Pandey, S., Pandey, S., Dwivedi, S., Pandey, D., Mishra, H., & Mahapatra, S. (2020). Methods of various citing and referencing style: fundamentals for early career researchers. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09726-0
Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: definitions and why they matter. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 44(2), 84-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562018000000088
Permana, T. I., Hindun, I., Rofi'ah, N. L., & Azizah, A. S. N. (2019). Critical thinking skills: The academic ability, mastering concepts, and analytical skill of undergraduate students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7626
Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2012). Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (pp.23-32). Sage.
Pop, A. I., Lotrean, L. M., Buzoianu, A. D., Suciu, S. M., & Florea, M. (2022). Attitudes and practices regarding research among Romanian medical undergraduate students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1872-1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031872
Roder, D. C., & Pelzom, K. (2022). A case study of social science and humanities undergraduate research in Bhutan. Rig Tshoel-Research Journal of the Royal Thimphu College, 5(1), 8-23.
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.034
Shaw, K., Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2013). Student experience of final-year undergraduate research projects: an exploration of ‘research preparedness’. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.592937
Sileyew, K. J. (2020). Research design and methodology. In E. Abu-Taeih, A. El Mouatasim, & I. H. Al Hadid (Eds.), Cyberspace (pp.1-12). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78887
Sutrisna, M. (2009). Research methodology in doctoral research: Understanding the meaning of conducting qualitative research, Working Paper, In A. Ross (Ed.), Proceedings of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Doctoral Workshop (pp. 48-57). Liverpool John Moores University.
Wilson, A. E., Pollock, J. L., Billick, I., Domingo, C., Fernandez-Figueroa, E. G., Nagy, E. S., Steury, T. D., & Summers, A. (2018). Assessing science training programs: Structured undergraduate research programs make a difference. BioScience, 68(7), 529-534. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy052
_[eISSN___2504-8562]_-_Google_Scholar_-_Google_Chrome_9_11_2022_10_01_52_PM.png)
.png)
