The Maldives Criminal Court's Approach in Engaging the Parties in First-degree Felony Murder: A Content Analysis
Abstract
The laws concerning first-degree felony murder in the Maldives allow mitigating the punishment if the victim pardons the offender. However, many offenders do not receive a pardon from their victims. Relevant literature suggests that a successful reconciliation would occur in an environment that fosters the expression of remorse and forgiveness. The contrasting outcome indicates a need to understand if the court procedures promote an empathetic outcome. The present analysis aims to address the gap by establishing the approach of the Criminal Court to engaging the parties in cases involving first-degree felony murder, identifying if the court encourages the expression of remorse and forgiveness and establishing how the current approach affects the outcome of the cases. By employing a content analysis method driven by the literature on restorative justice theory, the present study analysed seven different court cases concluded between 2020 and 2023 September that involved first-degree felony murder. The analysis showed that the approach of the Criminal Court to engaging the parties in a first-degree felony murder may include explaining the rights of a victim in the legal system of the Maldives, attempting to humanise the offender or the victim or simply seeking the opinion of the victim concerning the punishment. The case analysis also demonstrated that offenders were less remorseful and victims were less forgiving. The analysis showed that the current procedures are inadequate to foster remorse and forgiveness and recommended employing restorative justice processes to engage the parties.
Downloads
References
Abdul Ghafoor, G., Dziyauddin, H., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Murder Trials in the Maldives from a Therapeutic Lens. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI11), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI11.4165
Batchelor, D. (2023). Talking punishment: How victim perceptions of punishment change when they communicate with offenders. Punishment & Society, 25(2), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211054748
Halim, A., & Sri Ismoyo. (2023). Analysis of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System. Enigma in Law, 1(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i1.13
Ibrahim, M., & Buang, A. H. (2018). Maldivian Legal System: Islamic Influence And Legal Reform. Jurnal Syariah, Jil. 26, Bil, 1(1), 71–98.
Jonas, J., Zebel, S., Claessen, J., & Nelen, H. (2022). The Psychological Impact of Participation in Victim-Offender Mediation on Offenders: Evidence for Increased Compunction and Victim Empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.812629
Kirkham, R., & O'Loughlin, E. A. (2019). A content analysis of judicial decision-making. In Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods (pp. 329–341). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429952814-24
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7113. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Martinez-Diaz, P., Caperos, J. M., Prieto-Ursúa, M., Gismero-González, E., Cagigal, V., & Carrasco, M. J. (2021). Victim's Perspective of Forgiveness Seeking Behaviors After Transgressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656689
Meléndez, A. (2021). The role of criminogenic needs and emotions in restorative justice: Offenders' experiences in victim–offender mediation. European Journal of Probation, 13(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220320948374
Nascimento, A. M., Andrade, J., & de Castro Rodrigues, A. (2023). The Psychological Impact of Restorative Justice Practices on Victims of Crimes—a Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1929–1947. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085
PG v Aafiyaa Mohamed Manik [2015] 386/Cr-C/2015
PG v Abdul Ghafoor Qasim & Aziza Ibrahim [2016] 669/Cr-C/2016
PG v Abu Kalam [2017] 707/Cr-C/2017
PG v Adhuham Muhammad [2020] 62/Cr-C/2020
PG v Ali Hamza [2015] 725/Cr-C/2015
PG v Aminath Shaahee Aalam & Ibrahim Wisam [2013] 554/Cr-C/2013
PG v Aminath Shaahidhaa [2016] 792/Cr-C/2016
PG v Hussain Mavaz [2023] 365/Cr-C/2023
PG v Hussain Nihad Ahmad & Hussain Jailam [2018] 850/Cr-C/2018
PG v Ismail Aneeq & Others [2015] 504/Cr-C/2015
PG v Ismail Haisham & Others [2017] 711/Cr-C/2017
PG v Mohamed Humaid [2016] 1129/Cr-C/2016
PG v Mohamed Mafaz Hussain Saleem [2017] 1117/Cr-C/2017
PG v Mohamed Shanoon & Ali Sifaam [2015] 325/Cr-C/2015
PG v Shaa Alom Miya [2021] 734/Cr-C/2021
PG v Shumon Miya [2017] 723/Cr-C/2017
PG v Yameen Rasheed [2017] 1281/Cr-C/2017
Priyana, Y., Assayuti, A. A., & Romdoni, M. (2023). Exploring the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practice in Criminal Law System. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 107–114.
Suzuki, M. (2023). Victim Recovery in Restorative Justice: A Theoretical Framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(12), 1893–1908. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206828
Suzuki, M., & Yuan, X. (2021). How Does Restorative Justice Work? A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(10), 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854821994622
The Court Procedure for Administering Punishment, No. (2/2021) (mv)
The Law on Intimidation and Possession of a Lethal Weapon L. No. (17/2010) (mv)
The noble quran. (n.d.). Quran.Com. Retrieved 27 February 2024, from https://quran.com
The Penal Code of the Maldives, L. No. (9/2014) (mv)
Witvliet, C. V. O., Wade, N. G., Worthington, E. L., Root Luna, L., Van Tongeren, D. R., Berry, J. W., & Tsang, J.-A. (2020). Apology and Restitution: Offender Accountability Responses Influence Victim Empathy and Forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 48(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647120915181