Leadership for Technology Integration in Teaching Mathematics: A Comparative Study Between Two Private Institutions

  • Foong Chui Yean Faculty of Education & Social Sciences, Open University Malaysia, No. 55 – 57, Persiaran Greenhill 30450 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.
Keywords: Technology integration, Diffusion of Innovation Model, Transformational leadership, curriculum change

Abstract

The calling for technology integration in teaching mathematics has become louder as mathematics enables advanced understanding of concepts in other STEM subjects. However, technology integration in teaching mathematics has posed challenges for curriculum leaders and teachers. Hence, this study intended to investigate the curriculum change process involving technology integration from the principals' perspectives and their leadership approach to effective curriculum change management. The study adopted a qualitative research method. Data were collected via email interviews with two principals managing private institutions that offer the same math program for primary school students. The findings showed that Rogers’ diffusion of innovation model supported the curriculum change process involving technology adoption in teaching mathematics. In addition, the principals were found to have distinct perspectives on curriculum change implementation and, hence, had adopted different leadership approaches in managing curriculum change. The findings of this study imply that future leadership development programs should focus on developing transformational leadership qualities that enhance curriculum change processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A.H., Cheing, J.C.K., Surif, J., Mokhtar, M., Ali, M., & Ibrahim, N.H. (2016). Factors preventing Malaysian teachers from using information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching mathematics. In 2016 Fourth International Conference and Communication Technologies (ICoICT), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303623616_Factors_Preventing_Malaysian_Teachers_From_Using_Information_and_Communication_Technology_ICT_in_Teaching_Mathematics

Anderson, J.R. (2023). Remembering why small effects are impressive: A student learning driven model for curriculum change. Business Education Innovation Journal, 15(1), 92-97. Retrieved from http://www.beijournal.com/images/V15_N1_final.pdf

Aspin, S.H., Ali, M., & Bunyamin, M.A.H. (2022). STEM education in Malaysia: A review. Learning Science and Mathematics, 15, 125-139. http://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_LSMJournal/images/docs/2022/2022_9_ASPIN_125139.pdf

Azman, N.A.N.N., Hanafi, W.N.W., & Salleh, S.M. (2021). Exploring factors for teachers’ perceptions towards virtual learning during COVID-19 pandemic ear from the perspective of Diffusion Innovation Theory. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 13(4), 286-295. Retrieved from http://gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v13n4s/V13N4s-23.pdf

Bass, B. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410

Brewer, N. T., Hallman, W. K., Fiedler, N., & Kipen, H. M. (2004). Why Do People Report Better Health by Phone Than by Mail? Medical Care, 42(9), 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000135817.31355.6b

Brown, M., Bron, R., & Nandedkar, A. (2019). Transformational leadership theory and exploring the perceptions of diversity management in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(7), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v19i7.2527

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2015). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/43968/Thematic%20analysis_Journal%20Positive%20Psychology_ACCEPTED..pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Creswell, J.W., & Guetterman, T.C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Daher, W., Baya’a., N., Anabousy, R. (2018). In-service mathematics teachers’ integration of ICT as innovative practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 534-543. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.428945

Das, K. (2019). Role of ICT for better mathematic teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.641

Dahlin, E. (2021). Email interviews: A guide to research design and implementation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025453

DeMatthews, D.E. (2014). How to improve curriculum leadership: Integrating leadership theory and management strategies. The Clearing House, 87, 192-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.911141

Drape, T.A., Westfall-Rudd, D., Doak, S., Guthrie, J. & Mykerezi, P. (2013). Technology integration in an Agriculture Associate’s Degree program: A case study guided by Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture, 24-35. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.57.1.24

Endeley, M.N., & Zama, M.A. (2021). Perspectives in curriculum studies. Spears Books.

Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM Education: What does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshaman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.). Mathematics education in the margins (pp.237-244). MERGA. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572451.pdf

Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2014). Education PLUS: The world will be led by people you can count on, including you! [White paper]. Collaborative Impact SPC. https://www.michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Education-Plus-A-Whitepaper-July-2014-1.pdf

Fusch, P., Fusch, G.E., & Ness, L.R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02

Govindasamy, V., & Mestry, R. (2022). The principal’s role in managing curriculum change: Implications for the provision of quality education. South African Journal of Education, 42(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n4a2294

Gumus, S., Bellibas, M.S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2016). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in education research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296

Harris, A., Jones, M., & Crick, T. (2020). Curriculum leadership: A critical contributor to school and system improvement. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1704470

Hiefield, M. (2 March, 2023). Don’t let technology get in the way of student learning. ISTE. https://iste.org/blog/dont-let-technology-get-in-the-way-of-student-learning

Holst, G.M. (2021). Transactional, instrumental and transformational leadership: What is more effective for an industry 4.0 transformation? [Master’s thesis, University of Twente]. Drienerlolaan. https://essay.utwente.nl/88646/

Ince-Muslu, B., & Erduran, A. (2021). A suggestion of a framework: Conceptualisation of the factors that affect technology integration in mathematics education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9292

Kek, P.J.W., & Maat, S.M. (2020). Integration of ICT in teaching and learning mathematics: Feature of systematic literature. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(12). 288-299. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.582

Law, M.Y. (2022). A review of curriculum change and innovation for higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 10(2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v10i2.5448

Leong, T.D.C.P. (2022). Curriculum change management amidst pandemic crisis: Comparative study of academic leadership in quantity surveying programs. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i4.1464

Li, M. (2023). Chinese mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward ICT integration in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13346

Mckee, S., & Gauch, D. (2020). Implications of industry 4.0 on skills development. In B. Panth & R. Maclean (Eds.), Anticipating and preparing for emerging skills and jobs, education in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, concerns and prospects 55 (pp. 279-287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7018-6

Ministry of Education Malaysia (2015). Annual Report 2015: Malaysia education blueprint (2013-2025).

Morgan, H. (2021). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report 2021, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Mulenga, E.M. & Phiri, P.A. (2018). Zambian teachers’ profiles of ICT use in mathematics pedagogy. Journal of Basic and Applied Research International, 24(4), 137-148.

O’Shea, C. (2021). Distributed leadership and innovative teaching practices. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100088

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.

Penprase, B.E. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and higher education. In N.W. Gleason (Eds.), Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution (pp. 207-229). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0

Prestiadi, D., Gunawan, I., & Sumarsono, R.B. (2020). Role of transformational leadership in education 4.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 501, 120-124. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125947666.pdf

Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press. Retrieved from https://teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/everett-m-rogers-diffusion-of-innovations.pdf

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501453.pdf

Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Stainton-Rogers, W., & Willig, C. (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. (pp. 53-80). Sage Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://med-fom-familymed-research.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/03/IPA_Smith_Osborne21632.pdf

Soh, W.G., & Mohamad, B.B.A. (2021). A journey of a thousand miles begins with a quantum step: The importance of quantum leadership to promote lifelong learning in organisations. Ilkogretim Online – Elementary Education Online, 20(3), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.24

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of Science Education Technology, Knowledge, Learning, 20(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Xiong, X.B., Lim, C.P., & Liu, S.Q. (2019). Curriculum leadership and the enhancement of teacher education programs: A case study in a Mainland Chinese normal university. Asian Education and Development, 9(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-12-2018-0181

Published
2024-02-27
How to Cite
Chui Yean, F. (2024) “Leadership for Technology Integration in Teaching Mathematics: A Comparative Study Between Two Private Institutions”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 9(2), p. e002697. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v9i2.2697.
Section
Articles