A Literature Review on the Identity Construction of the Simulacra Subject in Jean Genet’s The Balcony
Abstract
Jean Genet's The Balcony explores the fundamental elements of subject identity construction and identification within a framework of double paradoxes. The reconfigurations of simulacra activities challenge the traditional political model of theater, redefining the nature and expression of the subject's identity and endowing theatrical representation with political potential. The subject of simulacra exists in a constant state of internal and external constitutive difference, emphasizing the essential incompleteness and antagonistic dimension of identity construction, which resonates with the political realm. The dual nature of the other renders the construction of the subject's identity an insurmountable task, while the perpetual opposition of the dual relationship converges into tertiary natures, exposing the failure point of impossibility and necessity in subject identity construction. The trinity mode of the subject continually replaces power relationships through negation, engendering space for reflection. This paper employs Deleuze's theory of in-itself difference and Mouffe and Laclau's theory of antagonism and hegemony to analyze the foundational structural strategy of subject identity construction and identification in The Balcony. It elucidates how this strategy establishes the necessary conditions for the autonomy of politics within Genet Theatre.
Downloads
References
Bosteels, B. (2011). Badiou and politics. Duke University Press.
Butler, J. (2000). Restaging the universal: Hegemony and the limits of formalism. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp.44-89). Verso.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968).
Fisher, T., & Katsouraki, E. (Eds.). (2017). Performing Antagonism: Theatre, Performance & Radical Democracy. Springer.
Jabri, V. (2006). Shock and awe: Power and the resistance of art. Millennium, 34(3), 819-839.https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340031601.
Genet, J. (1966). The Balcony. (B. Frechtman, Trans.). New York. Grove Press. (Original work published 1956).
Rancière, J. (2009). Aesthetics and its Discontents. Polity.
Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp.44-89). Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Books.
Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1990). Heidegger, art, and politics: The fiction of the political. (C. Turner, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1990).
Lavery, C. (2006). Between negativity and resistance: Jean Genet and committed theatre. Contemporary Theatre Review, 16(2), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486800600587229
Lotina, G. P. (2017). The political dimension of dance: Mouffe’s theory of agonism and choreography. In T. Fisher & E. Katsouraki (Eds.), Performing Antagonism: Theatre, Performance & Radical Democracy (pp.251-272). Springer.
Mouffe, C. (1993). The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.
Smith, D. W. (2006). The concept of the simulacrum: Deleuze and the overturning of Platonism. Continental Philosophy Review, 38(1-2), 89-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-3305-8
Vernant, J. P. (1991). The birth of image. In F.I. Zeitlin (Ed.), Mortals and immortals: Collected essays(pp.164-185). Princeton University Press.
