Perbandingan Penggunaan Kohesi Jenis Perulangan dalam Penulisan Karangan Murid Tingkatan 4: Satu Analisis Keperluan
Abstract
Kohesi perulangan merupakan kohesi jenis leksikal berfungsi sebagai alat pertautan antara kata, frasa dan ayat yang terdiri daripada perulangan sama, sama maksud dan rujukan. Kohesi jenis ini merupakan salah satu elemen dalam aspek kemahiran menulis terutamanya karangan bagi meningkatkan kualiti wacana yang baik. Kajian ini merupakan analisis keperluan dalam fasa satu reka bentuk kajian Design and Development Research (DDR). Tujuan kajian analisis keperluan ini dilaksanakan adalah bagi melihat kekerapan perulangan sama, sama maksud dan rujukan antara perkataan kata kunci soalan dengan binaan karangan. Kajian dilakukan secara kualitatif menggunakan kaedah analisis dokumen melibatkan 200 buah penulisan karangan murid, iaitu, 100 buah karangan jenis ekspositori dan 100 buah karangan jenis argumentasi. Pemilihan sampel adalah secara persampelan bertujuan di dua buah sekolah menengah harian di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur. Data temu bual dianalisis menggunakan perisian Antconc Versi 4.1.0 bagi melihat kekerapan kohesi perulangan antara perkataan kata kunci soalan dengan binaan karangan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kohesi perulangan antara perkataan kata kunci soalan dengan binaan karangan paling tinggi ialah perulangan sama, sebanyak 5056 kali, kedua perulangan rujukan sebanyak 2282 kali dan paling rendah perulangan sama maksud sebanyak 203 kali. Oleh itu, pemberatan haruslah diberikan kepada kohesi jenis perulangan sama maksud yang paling sedikit diaplikasikan oleh murid dalam penulisan karangan agar mereka dapat menyeimbangkan penggunaan jenis kohesi dalam binaan karangan mereka.
Downloads
References
Amaechi, U. E., & Edwin, C. (2019). Lexical cohesion in non-fictional narrative as discourse: A study of Ngugi Wa Thiong’O’s Decolonizing the Mind. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 7(3), 83-90.
Araujo, D., Rigo, S. J., Schmitt, B. K. & Hentges, A. (2019). A linguistic approach to short sentences keywords identification for a question answering system. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology,14(4), 367-382.
Basuki, R. S., Andayani & Sahid, T. W. (2019). Cohesion and coherence of narrative essays of Madagascar students of Indonesian Language for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) at UPTP2B Sebelas Maret University. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 2(1),136-142.
Brill, G. & Yarden, A. (2003). Learning Biology through research papers: A stimulus for question-asking by high-school students. Cell Biology Education, 2(4), 266–274.
Crossley, S. A., Rose, D. F., Danekes, C., Rose, C. W. & McNamara, D. S. (2016). That noun phrase may be beneficial and this may not be: Discourse cohesion in reading and writing. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 30(1), 569-589.
Dahlia Janan, Mohammad Hafiz Mohammad Tarmizi, Punaji Setyosari, Norliza Jamaluddin, Siti Saniah Abu Bakar & Lin, C. Y. (2024). Model Of Teaching Malay Language To Non-Native And Foreign Speaker. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 1–38.
Enas, A. E. R. (2020). EFL Students’ Coherence Skill in Writing: A Case Study of Third Year Students of Bachelors in English Language. English Language Teaching, 13(8), 120-126.
Fatimah, S. N. & Yunus, M. M. (2014). The use of lexical cohesion among TESL postgraduate students in academic writing. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 847-869.
Gutkind, L. (2012). You can’t make this stuff up: The complete guide to writing creative non - fiction: from memoir to literary Journalism and everything in between. USA: Da Capo Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hublová, G. (2017). Reiteration relations in EFL student academic writing and the effects of online learning. Discourse and Interaction, 10(1), 71-89.
Isti’anah, A., Putri, S. P., & Permata, A. G. (2020). Cohesion in journal articles on applied linguistics: the case of conjunction “thus.” Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 4(1), 68-78.
Javadi, E. & Gebauer, J. (2019). An experimental study of the attention-based view of idea integration: The need for a multi-level dependent variable. Journal Of Information Technology Theory and Application, 20(1), 1-27.
Junina, A. K. (2022). Grammatical Cohesion in Argumentative Essays by International EAP Learners in New Zealand. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(2), 98-108.
Klarer, M. (1999). An Introduction to Literary Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
Krishnan, S. D., Norman, H., & Yunus, M. (2021). Online gamified learning to enhance teachers’ competencies using Classcraft. Sustainability, 13(19), 10817.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan kupasan mata pelajaran bahasa Melayu Kertas 1 Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Masadeh, T. S. (2019). Cohesion and coherence in the writings of Saudi Undergraduates Majoring in English. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3), 200-208.
Mohd Ridzuan Padzil, Aidah Abd Karim & Hazrati Husnin. (2021). Employing DDR to Design and Develop a Flipped Classroom and Project based Learning Module to Applying Design Thinking in Design and Technology. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 12(9), 791-798.
Mu-hsuan, C. (2012). Implementing keyword and question generation approaches in teaching EFL summary writing. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 36-41.
Nordin, S., & Yunus, K. (2021). Modelling teachers’ behaviour in ICT usage. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2), 984-994
Norfaizah Adbul Jobar. (2019). Analisis tekstual dalam penulisan karangan murid bahasa kedua. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4 (26), 93-103.
Nurmasitah Mat Hassan & Jama’yah Zakaria. (2015). Kohesi gramatikal penghubung dalam karangan berbahasa Melayu. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics (IJLEAL), 3(1), 101-113.
Nurmasitah Mat Hassan. (2016). Kohesi dalam penulisan karangan bahasa Melayu pelajar di sebuah universiti awam (Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Ramli Yaacob. (2017). Kesan pengajaran terancang kohesi nahuan konjungsi dalam penulisan karangan bahasa Melayu (Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Richey, R. C. & Klien, J.D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issue. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Rozita Mohamad Yuneh, Rahim Aman & Shahidi A.H (2022). Model Pengajaran Unsur Tautan (2009) dalam Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu: Trend, Elemen dan Faedah. Jurnal Melayu, 21(1), 42-58.
Sanat Md Nasir. (2002). Tautan dalam wacana bahasa Melayu akhbar. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Saedah Siraj, Muhd Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah & Rozaini Muhd Rozkee. (2020). Pendekatan penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan: Aplikasi kepada penyelidikan Pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Nur Niaga Sdn. Bhd.
Shamova, N. (2021). A Comparative-Contrastive Analysis of Corpus Tools (Case Study: Working with Corpora of Cinematic Discourse). Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University Bulletin,1(53), 82–95.
Stambouli, M., & Belmekki, A. (2019). A proposed metacognitive-based approach to promoting EFL cohesion and coherence in essay writing of Algerian Master students. In Hidri S. (eds) English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa (95-111).
Usoro, M. O. (2020). Qualities of a good essay: An assessment of the writings of Nigerian undergraduates. International Journal on Integrated Education, 3(4), 82-88.
Vargas, A. L. R., Quesada, A. P. S., Vásquez, J. M. V. & Rojas, A. J. (2020). Consciousness-raising tasks for the mediation of text structure, cohesion, and coherence in essay writing. Revista Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 20(2), 1-27.
Veda, A. Y. (2017). The role of composing process andcoherence/cohesion in FFL writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 336-351.
Vivi Yulia Pratiwi, Yeni Dwi Jayanti & Isry Laila Syathroh. (2019). An analysis of lexical cohesion found in “Never Say Never” song lyrics. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(3), 376-383.
Youcheng Pan, Baotian Hu, Qingcai Chen, Yang Xiang & Xiaolong Wang. (2020). Learning to generate diverse questions from keywords. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 4-8 Mei. Barcelona, 8224-8228.
Yuliani Trisnaningrum, Alek & Didin Nuruddin Hidayat. (2019). Discourse analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in college students’ academic essays writing. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 6(1), 79-90.
Zamnah, L. N., Zaenuri, Wardono & Sukestiyarno. (2021). Make questions as a stimulus for students to help them carry out their Polya’s step in solving problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918, 1-4.Doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042099.
Zamri Salleh & Abdull Sukor Shaari. (2009). Kesan Model Unsur Tautan terhadap pengajaran karangan bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(1), 55-78.
Zia Hisni Mubarak. (2019). The analysis of repetition as part of lexical cohesion in talk shows. Jurnal Basis, 6(1), 81-94.
Zulfiqar Ahmad. (2019). Differences between students' linguistic knowledge and text production ability: A case of the use of cohesion as a resource of texture in academic writing. World Journal of English Language, 9(2), 55-63.
