Explaining UMNO’s Downfall Post GE14 and GE15: The Strengthened Convergence Between Two Cleavage Structures

  • Aaron Denison Deivasagayam Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, International Peace and Co-existence Program, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan
Keywords: Malaysia, UMNO, Elections, Dominant party, Social cleavage

Abstract

UMNO's electoral defeat in 2018 and 2022 facilitated a transformation in the Malaysian political landscape. While the party’s defeat could be ascribed to conventional factors, including narratives of elite corruption linked to its leadership and internal factionalism; however, another significant factor that contributed to UMNO’s remarkable downfall was the cleavage structure that shifted away from the party which therefore eroded their political support. The article seeks to demonstrate the erosion of UMNO’s influence among the Malay electorates, particularly in its traditional strongholds of rural parliamentary constituencies in Peninsular Malaysia due to modifications in the cleavage structure. The analysis of the 2013, 2018, and 2022 general elections indicated that UMNO ceded votes to the Islamic party, PAS and the newly formed Malay party, BERSATU, which were partners of the Pakatan Harapan opposition coalition in 2018. The outcomes of the 2022 general elections revealed a further decline in support for UMNO among Malay electorates, attributed to the merger between PAS and BERSATU, to establish a perceived Malay-Muslim coalition in Perikatan Nasional. This article argues that UMNO lost its monopoly among the Malay electorates due to the strengthened convergence between the two cleavage structures of ethnicity and religion. The convergence was facilitated by UMNO's promotion of Islamisation, its normalisation of political cooperation with PAS, and the party’s inability to compete effectively with BERSATU which ended UMNO’s one-party dominance in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Hamid, A. F. (2018). The Islamist Factor in Malaysia’s Fourteenth General Election. The Round Table, 107(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2018.1545937

Abdul Hamid, A. F., & Ismail, M. T. (2014). Islamist Conservatism and the Demise of Islam Hadhari in Malaysia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 25(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.880549

Ahmad, R. (2022, November 16). INTERACTIVE: In GE15’s battle for rural seats, here is what you need to know. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2022/11/16/interactive-in-ge15s-battle-for-rural-seats-here-is-what-you-need-to-know

Awang Besar, J., Mohd Yusof, A. R., Ghazali, A. S., Ali, M., Yusuff, N. A., Nayan, N., & Boyman, S. N. (2020). Trend of Voting in Malaysian General Election 2018 in Urban and Rural Area. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 5(19), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.5190010

Bahrin, S., & Perera, P. D. A. (1977). FELDA: 21 Years of Land Development. FELDA.

Bartolini, S., & Mair, P. (2013). Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985. ECPR Press.

Batto, N. (2018). Cleavage structure and the demise of a dominant party: The role of national identity in the fall of the KMT in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 4(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891118788202

Bidu, M., & Hamil, J. (2018). Neofeudal UMNO : Politik dan Pembangunan Luar Bandar. Strategic Information And Research Development Centre, Puchong, Selangor, Malaysia.

Boucek, F. (2012). Factional politics : How dominant parties implode or stabilize. Palgrave Macmillan.

Chhibber, P. K., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The Puzzle of Indian Politics: Social Cleavages and the Indian Party System. British Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 191–210.

Chin, J. (2016). Malaysia: Heading for syariah domination? The Round Table, 105(6), 737–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2016.1246857

Chin, J. (2018). Sabah and Sarawak in the 14th General Election 2018 (GE14): Local Factors and State Nationalism. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700308

Chin, J. (2020). Malaysia: the 2020 putsch for Malay Islam supremacy. The Round Table, 109(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1760495

Chin, J. (2022). Malaysia in 2021: Another Regime Change and the Search for Malay Political Stability. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1, 195–210.

Chin, J. (2023). Anwar’s long walk to power: the 2022 Malaysian general elections. The Round Table, 112(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2165303

China Press. (2022, November 19). GE 15 Parliamentary Seats Demographic Data’. China Press. https://live.chinapress.com.my/ge15/parliamentMain

Cox, G. (1997). Making Votes Count : Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge Universtiy Press.

Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties : Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Methuen.

El-Muhammady, A. (2015). Applying Wasatiyah within Malaysian religio-political context. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 32(3), 134–140.

Ferree, K. E. (2006). Explaining South Africa’s Racial Census. The Journal of Politics, 68(4), 803–815.

Funston, J. (1980). Malay Politics in Malaysia. Heinemann Educational Books.

Funston, J. (2018). Malaysia’s 14th General Election (GE14) -The Contest for the Malay Electorate. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700304

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press

Hilley, J. (2001). Malaysia : Mahathirism, hegemony, and the new opposition. Zed Books.

Hirschman, C. (1987). The Meaning and Measurement of Ethnicity in Malaysia: An Analysis of Census Classifications. The Journal of Asian Studies, 46(3), 555–582.

Izzuddin, M. (2020). Malaysia in 2019: Enduring Stability in a Chaotic Year. Asian Survey, 60(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2020.60.1.100

JAKIM. (2017, October 16). Kenyataan Media Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Memperkasa Mahkamah Syariah Berkenaan Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Memperkasa Mahkamah Syariah. Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM). https://www.islam.gov.my/en/media-statement/394-kenyataan-media-pengerusi-jawatankuasa-memperkasa-mahkamah-syariah-berkenaan-mesyuarat-jawatankuasa-memperkasa-mahkamah-syariah

Judicial Appointment Commission Malaysia. (1957). LAWS OF MALAYSIA FEDERAL CONSTITUTION. Judicial Appointment Commission Malaysia. https://www.jac.gov.my/spk/images/stories/10_akta/perlembagaan_persekutuan/federal_constitution.pdf

Kessler, C. (2018). UMNO: Then, Now and Always . In The End of Umno? Essays on Malaysia’s Former Dominant Party. Gerakbudaya.

Khoo, B. T. (2020). Malay Politics. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Khor, Y. L., & Chia, J. (2020). FELDA and rural voting patterns in GE14 – a wake-up call. The Round Table, 109(2), 126–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1741882

Lahiri, I. (2005). Mahathir’s islam : a Socio-political Construal. Kolkata Ekush Shatak.

Liow, J. C. (2004). Political Islam in Malaysia: problematising discourse and practice in the UMNO–PAS “Islamisation race.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 42(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1466204042000299254

Liow, J. C. (2009). Piety and Politics: Islamism in Contemporary Malaysia. Oxford University Press.

Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. Free Press.

Loh, F. K. W. (2014). Hudud: Is UMNO goading PAS?’,. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 50(1), 113–122.

Merdeka Center. (2020, September 2). Survey: Muhyiddin approval rating at 69pct, PN most popular - Merdeka Center. Merdeka Center. https://merdeka.org/v2/survey-muhyiddin-approval-rating-at-69pct-pn-most-popular/

Mutalib, H. (1990). Islam and Ethnicity in Malay politics. Oxford University Press.

Myburgh, J., & Giliomee, H. (2010). One-party dominance in South Africa. In F. Boucek & M. Bogaards (Eds.), Dominant Political Parties and Democracy Concepts, Measures, Cases and Comparisons (pp. 175–195). Routledge.

Nadzri, M. M. N., & Azlan, A. A. (2023). UMNO in GE15: factionalism and its effects. The Round Table : The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 112(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2219536

Pandian, S. (2005). Legasi Mahathir. Utusan Publications & Distributors.

Pempel, T. J. (1990). Introduction. Uncommon Democracies : The One-Party Dominant Regimes. In T. J. Pempel (Ed.), Uncommon Democracies : The One-Party Dominant Regimes (pp. 1–32). Cornell University Press.

Rae, D. W., & Taylor, M. (1970). The Analysis of Political Cleavages. Yale University Press

Sabtu, M. H., Suhaimy, A. M., Razali, N. A., & Abdullah, M. H. (2021). Islamist Conservatism in Politics: Approach, Political Strategy and Performance of The Malaysian Islamic Party in the 14th General Election. JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol26no2.1

Salleh, H. (1991). State capitalism in Malaysian agriculture. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 21(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339180000231

Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Shamsul, A. B. (2004). From British to Bumiputera rule : local politics and rural development in peninsular Malaysia. Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Shamsul, A. B. (1997). The economic dimension of Malay nationalism. The Developing Economies, 35(3), 240–261.

Short, A. (1970). Communism, Race and Politics in Malaysia. Asian Survey, 10(12), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.2307/2643057

Smith, G. (2010). Hard and soft dominance: Assessing the case of the Bavarian CSU. In M. Bogaards & F. Boucek (Eds.), Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases and Comparisons (pp. 98–108). Routledge.

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia. (2013). Keputusan pilihan raya umum 2013. MySPR Semak. https://mysprsemak.spr.gov.my/semakan/keputusan/pru#

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia. (2018). Keputusan pilihan raya umum 2018. MySPR Semak. https://mysprsemak.spr.gov.my/semakan/keputusan/pru#

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia. (2022). Keputusan pilihan raya umum 2022. MySPR Semak. https://mysprsemak.spr.gov.my/semakan/keputusan/pru#

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: How things work. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Qualitative research: Studying how things work (pp. 11–35). The Guilford Press

Ufen, A. (2020). Clientelist and Programmatic Factionalism Within Malaysian Political Parties. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420916047

Ufen, A. (2022). Failed Autocratization: Malaysia under Najib Razak (2009–2018). Pacific Affairs, 95(3), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.5509/2022953527

Weiss, M., & Suffian, I. (2023). Decline, Fall, and Resurrection of a Dominant-coalition System: Malaysia’s Tortured Partisan Path. Pacific Affairs, 96(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.5509/2023962281

Welsh, B. (2015). Elections in Malaysia: Voting Behaviour and Electoral Integrity. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Published
2025-02-28
How to Cite
Deivasagayam, A. (2025) “Explaining UMNO’s Downfall Post GE14 and GE15: The Strengthened Convergence Between Two Cleavage Structures”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(2), p. e003248. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v10i2.3248.
Section
Articles