Pengaruh Teknologi Digital Terhadap Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum Sekolah Menengah

  • Sheila Michael Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
  • Abdul Said Ambotang Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
Keywords: teknologi digital, penglibatan pelajar, aktiviti kokurikulum, sekolah menengah

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji konsep pengaruh teknologi digital terhadap penglibatan pelajar dalam aktiviti kokurikulum sekolah menengah. Teknologi digital dalam kajian ini meliputi semua jenis peranti elektronik, gajet dan aplikasi yang menggunakan maklumat dalam bentuk digital termasuklah komputer riba, telefon pintar, serta lain-lain peranti berteknologi tinggi. Walaupun teknologi digital mempunyai faedah penggunaannya namun ia dikatakan memberi kesan kepada gaya hidup pelajar. Aktiviti kokurikulum kurang menjadi perhatian mereka sehingga mengabaikan kepentingannya ke atas pembentukkan dan keperibadian diri pelajar sekaligus memberi kesan ke atas perkembangan pendidikan. Oleh itu, teknologi digital didapati mempunyai pengaruh terhadap penglibatan pelajar dalam aktiviti kokurikulum sekolah menengah.

Statistics
Abstract views: 610 , PDF downloads: 413

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab. Alim, A. R. (2004). Pengurusan Gerak Kerja Kokurikulum. Selangor: Penerbit Oxford Sdn. Bhd.

Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The Future of a Radical Price. London: Random House.

Anderson, S. E., & Whitaker, R. C. (2010). Household routines and obesity in US preschool-aged children. Pediatrics, 125(3), 420-428.

Bell, V., Bishop, D. V. M. & Przybylski, A. K. (2015). The debate over digital technology and young people. British Medical Journal, 351.

Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Lee, S. M., Foley, J. T., Heitzler, C., & Huhman, M. (2010). Influence of limit-setting and participation in physical activity on youth screen time. Pediatrics, 126(1), e89-e96.

Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Kilgore, D., & Sheppard, S. (2009). Outside the Classroom: Gender Differences in Extracurricular Activities in Engineering Students.

Colabianchi, N., Johnston, L., & O’ Malley, P. (2012). Sports participation in secondary schools: Resources available and inequalities in participation — A BTG research brief. Ann Arbor: Bridging the Gap Program Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key Differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, First Monday (13:6).

Cradock, G. & Baldwin, C. (1833). Universal Technological Dictionary (Vol. 1).

Darling, N. (2015). Participation in extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(5), 493–505. 10.1007/s10964.

DeBell, M., Chapman, C., Kleiner, A., Lewis, L., Hudson, L., & Shafer, L. (2003). Computer and Internet Use. Editorial Note, 5(4), 7.

Dumais, S., (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: the role of habitus. Sociology of Education 75 (1), 44–68.

Ehn, P. (1988). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.

Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do Gender and Race Matter? Explaining the Relationship Between Sports Participation and Achievement. Sociological Spectrum 25:177–195.

Ekelund, U., Brage, S., Froberg, K., Harro, M., Anderssen, S. A., Sardinha, L. B., et al. (2006). TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: The European Youth Heart Study. PLoS Medicine, 2: 2449-2456.

Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 865-890.

Francis, B. (1999). Lads, Lasses and (New) Labour: 14-16-year-old students' responses to the 'laddish behaviour and boys' underachievement' debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 355-371.

George, M. J., & Odgers, C. L. (2015). Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10:832–851.

Gorely, T., Marshall, S. J., & Biddle, S. J. (2004). Couch kids: correlates of television viewing among youth. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 11(3), 152-163.

Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). "Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The Case of Building Internet," Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1-19.

Hanson, S., & Kraus, R. (1998). Women, sports, and science: Do female athletes have an advantage? Sociology of Education, 71, 93–110.

Hersey, J., & Jordan, A. (2007). Reducing children’s TV time to reduce the risk of childhood overweight: The children’s media use study.

Kallinikos, J. (2012). Form, Function, and Matter: Crossing the Border of Materiality, in Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi and J. Kallinikos (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-87.

Kaufman, J. & Gabler, J. (2004). Cultural Capital and Extracurricular Activities of Girls and Boys in the College Attainment Process. April 2004. Poetics 32(2):145-168.

King, J. L. & Lyytinen, K. (2005). Automotive informatics: information technology and enterprise transformation in the automobile world. In: Transforming Enterprise, Dutton, W., et al. (eds.), pp. 283–312. MIT Press, Boston, MA.

Kourandi, F., Krämer, J., & Valletti, T. M. (2014). Net Neutrality, Exclusivity Contracts and Internet Fragmentation, Information Systems Research (Forthcoming).

Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: The Penguin Press.

Liddell, H. G.,  Scott, R., Jones, H.S., & McKenzie, R. (1949). A Greek and English Lexicon.

Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G. M. (2003). The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS quarterly, 557-596.

Metsapelto, R. L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2014). The benefits of extracurricular activities for socioemotional behaviour and school achievement in middle childhood: An overview of the research. Journal for Educational Research Online, 6(3), 10-33.

Milosevic, L. (Ed.). (1995). Fairplay: Gender and physical education. Leeds, UK: Leeds City Council.

Morris, E. W. (2008). ’Rednecks, ‘Rutters’, and ‘Rithmetic’: social class, masculinity, and schooling in a rural context. Gender and Society, 22, 728–751.

Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. M. (2012). Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obesity reviews, 13(8), 659-680.

O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies 65(1):17-37.

Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Roberts, D., Foehr, U., & Rideout, V. (2005). Use of individual media. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in Media Use. March 2008. The Future of Children 18(1):11-37.

Roser, K., Schoeni, A., Foerster, M., & Roosli, M. (2016). Problematic mobile phone use of Swiss adolescents: is it linked with mental health or behaviour?. International Journal of Public Health, 61(3), 307-315.

Shapiro, A. L. (1999). The Control Revolution: How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Sjolie, A. N., & Thuen, F. (2002). School journeys and leisure activities in rural and urban adolescents in Norway. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 21-30.

Snyder, E. E., & Spreitzer, E. (1977). Participation in sport as related to educational expectations among high school girls. Sociology of Education, 50, 47-55.

Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sorensen, C. (2010a). "Desperately Seeking the Infrastructure in IS Research: Conceptualization of "Digital Convergence" as Co-Evolution of Social and Technical Infrastructures," System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on: IEEE, pp. 1-10.

Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010b). "Research Commentary-Digital Infrastructures:  The  Missing  IS  Research  Agenda," Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

Turkle, S. (2011). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon and Schuster.

Warrington, M., Younger M. & Williams, J. (2000). 'Student Attitudes, Image and the Gender Gap'. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 393-407.

Zittrain, J., (2006). The Generative Internet. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 119, p. 1974, May 2006; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 28/2006; Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2006/1.
Published
2020-06-14
How to Cite
Michael, S. and Ambotang, A. S. (2020) “Pengaruh Teknologi Digital Terhadap Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum Sekolah Menengah”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(6), pp. 25 - 32. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i6.417.
Section
Articles