Analisis Domain Kognitif bagi Latihan dalam Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 6

  • Jia Wei Cheng Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
  • Roslinda Binti Rosli Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
Keywords: buku teks, domain kognitif, latihan, analisis kandungan, matematik

Abstract

Buku teks merupakan salah satu alat bantu mengajar yang penting dalam pendidikan matematik. Justeru, kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau dan meneroka domain kognitif bagi latihan-latihan dalam buku teks matematik tahun 6 Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) dan Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina (SJKC). Kajian ini menggunakan analisis kandungan di mana latihan dalam buku teks matematik dikelaskan dari segi jenis latihan dan domain kognitif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa sebahagian besar latihan matematik dalam kedua-dua buku teks matematik berada dalam domain mengetahui. Peratusan latihan matematik berdasarkan jenis latihan, domain kognitif dan tajuk telah menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang ketara dalam kedua-dua buku teks matematik SK dan SJKC. Walaupun menggunakan kurikulum matematik yang sama dalam semua sekolah rendah, usaha penambahbaikan buku teks harus diteruskan untuk mengurangkan jurang tahap isi kandungan buku teks agar dapat memenuhi keperluan pelajar dan keperluan semasa.

Statistics
Abstract views: 39 , PDF downloads: 37

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boerman-Cornell, W., Klanderman, D., & Schut, A. (2016). Using Harry Potter to Bridge Higher Dimensionality in Mathematics and High-Interest Literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.597

Brehmer, D., Ryve, A., & Van Steenbrugge, H. (2016). Problem solving in Swedish mathematics textbooks for upper secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 577-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066427

Chan, Y. L., & Marzita Puteh. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Matematik Tahun 6 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Ebrahim Mohammadpour & Mohamed Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2014). Mathematics achievement as a function of within-and between-school differences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 189-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.725097

Gracin, D. G. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1431849

Grønmo, L. S., Lindquist, M., Arora, A., & Mullis, I. V. (2015). TIMSS 2015 mathematics framework. TIMSS, 11-28.

Kai, J. T., Zaleha Ismail & Mardhiyana Abidin. (2017). A Comparative Analysis on Cognitive Domain for the Malaysian Primary Four Textbook Series. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(4): 1273-1286.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2011). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.

Kletzien, S. B., & Dreher, M. J. (2017). What Experiences Do Expository Books on Recommended Book Lists Offer to K–2 Students?. Reading Psychology, 38(1), 71-96.

Lee, E., Lee, K., & Park, M. (2019). Developing Preservice Teachers’ Abilities to Modify Mathematical Tasks: Using Noticing-Oriented Activities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 965–985.

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x

Nie, B., Freedman, T., Hwang, S., Wang, N., Moyer, J. C., & Cai, J. (2013). An investigation of teachers’ intentions and reflections about using Standards-based and traditional textbooks in the classroom. ZDM, 45(5), 699-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0493-7

Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225

Popp, J. S. (2018). Teachers’ Text Selections and Explanations About Text Selection and Use in History/Social Studies. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918786891

Shepin, L. G. (2019). Making Authentic Literary Texts Relevant, Meaningful, and Fun in Advanced Beginner and Intermediate Spanish-language Classrooms. Hispania, 102, 313-318.

Son, J. W. (2012). A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity: the case of fraction addition and subtraction. ZDM, 44(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0386-1

Tan, S. N., Looi, L. M., Lee, K. N., & Lee, K. K. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Matematik Tahun 6 Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina. Penerbitan Pelangi Sdn. Bhd.

Villeneuve, E. F., Hajovsky, D. B., Mason, B. A., & Lewno, B. M. (2019). Cognitive ability and math computation developmental relations with math problem solving: An integrated, multigroup approach. School Psychology, 34(1), 96–108.

Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3

Wong, K. H. (2019, August 30). Ada apa dengan sekolah cina?. Malaysiakini.
Published
2020-11-01
How to Cite
Cheng, J. W. and Rosli, R. (2020) “Analisis Domain Kognitif bagi Latihan dalam Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 6”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), pp. 116 - 126. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i11.549.
Section
Articles