Comparison and Contrast between Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and Shamsul’s Two Social Reality Approach in the Portrayal of Identity

  • Sharon Regina Vega School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)
  • Sivamurugan Pandian School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)
  • Nur Hafeeza Ahmad Pazil School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)
Keywords: theory of practice, two social reality, structure, identity


This paper analyses Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice, the concept field and habitus and Shamsul Amri’s Two Social Reality, the concept everyday- defined and authority-defined as both theories that function as analytical tools and have similar narratives based on the macro/micro and structure/agency linkage. A comparison and contrast of both theories were analysed to further understand the use of each theory. Findings within the article show both theories have a structural or authoritative emphasis however the theories differ in functionality with Bourdieu’s “Theory of Practice” focusing on power dynamics and social class through direct link between the habitus, field and capital whereas Shamsul’s Two Social Reality focuses on the formation of identity and ethnic dynamics in Malaysia based on the effect of colonialism in the authority-defined and everyday-defined sphere. The main goal of this paper serves to highlight both theories and its application when analysing and tackling different social phenomena and narratives in future research.


Download data is not yet available.


Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity? Sociology, 40(3): 511- 528. Retrieved from

Block, D. (2013). The structure and agency dilemma in identity and intercultural communication research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(2): 126-147. Retrieved from

Bottero, W. (2010). Intersubjectivity and Bourdieusian approaches to ‘identity’. Cultural Sociology, 4(1): 3-22. Doi: 10.1177/1749975509356750

Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; in French 1972).

Bourdieu, P. (1977b). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6): 645–668. Retrieved from

Bourdieu, P. (1977c) 'Symbolic power', in D. Gleeson (ed.), Identity and Structure: Issues in the Sociology of Education (Driffield: Nafferton Books)

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.)

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice, Cambridge Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage

Bourdieu, P., L. Boltanski and M. de Saint Martin. (1978) 'Changes in social structure and changes in the demand for educaton', inS. Giner and M.S. Archer (eds), Contemporary Europe: Social Structures and Cultural Patterns (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond ‘Identity’. Theory and Society, 29(1): 1–47. Retrieved from

Carlsnaes, W. (1992). The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3): 245–270. JSTOR. Retrieved from

Clarke, M. (2000). Rosa Parks’ Performativity, Habitus, and Ability to Play the Game. Philosophy Today, 44(Supplement): 160–168. Retrieved from

Cockerham, W. C. (2005). Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. Journal of health and social behavior, 46(1): 51-67. Retrieved from

De Nooy, W., (2003) ‘Fields and network analysis: correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory’, Poetics, 31 (5-6): 305-327.

DiMaggio, P. (1979). On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6): 1460–1474. JSTOR. Retrieved from

Fabiansson, C. (2015). Young people’s societal belonging and perception of social status within networks. Rural Society, 24(1): 85–105. Retrieved from

Fernandis, G. (2000). Papia, Relijang e Tradisang. The Portuguese Eurasians in Malaysia: Bumiquest, a Search for Self Identity. Lustopie (7). Retrieved from

Goetze, C. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu’s Toolbox: Fields, Power, Practices, and Habitus in theAnalysis of Peacebuilding. In The distinction of peace: a social analysis of peacebuilding. [E-book] (15-39). University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from

Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (Eds.). (1990). An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Retrieved from

Hay, C. (2002) ‘Globalisation as a Problem of Political Analysis: Restoring Agents to a “Process without a Subject” and Politics to a Logic of Economic Compulsion’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(3): 379–392. Doi: 10.1080/0955757022000010935.

Hilgers, M., & Mangez, É. (2014). Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social fields. In M. Hilgers & É. Mangez (Eds.) Bourdieu's theory of social fields: concepts and applications, [E-book] (1-36). Routledge. Retrieved from

Jones, S. (1997). The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge.

Kipo, D. (2013). Agency-Structure Relation in Social Sciences: Reflections on Policy Implementation. Asian Social Science, 10(2). Retrieved from

Kupari, H. (2016). Practice, Habitus and Lived Religion. In Lifelong Religion as Habitus: religious practice among displaced Karelian Orthodox women in Finland Chapter 2. [E-book] (10-33). Brill. Retrieved from

Lacroix, T. (2012). Designing a structure/agency approach to transnationalism, the international Migration Institute (IMI), IMI working Paper Series 2013, No. 65. Retrieved from

Lahire, B. (2014). The limits of the field: Elements for a theory of the social differentiation of activities. In M. Hilgers & E. Mangez (Eds.), Bourdieu's Theory of Social Fields. Concept and application. [e-book] 62- 101. Routledge. Retrieved from

Layder, D. (1994). Understanding social theory. Sage.

Levine, H. B. (1999). Reconstructing Ethnicity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(2): 165. Retrieved from

Liska, A. E. (1990). The Significance of Aggregate Dependent Variables and Contextual Independent Variables for Linking Macro and Micro Theories. Social Psychology Quarterly 53(4), 292-301. JSTOR. Retrieved from

Mehdi, R., Hossein, M., Abdulhadi, M. & Abolfazl, H. (2014). The Relationship between Structure and Agency in Communicative Action Theory. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 3(2): 141-149. Retrieved from

Ngarachu, F. W. (2014). APPLYING PIERRE BOURDIEU’S CONCEPTS OF HABITUS AND FIELD TO THE STUDY OF ETHNICITY IN KENYA. Journal of Language, Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa, 5(1): 57-69. Retrieved from

Ong, W. J. (2013). Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture (Reprint edition). Cornell University Press.

Pirnajmuddin, H., & Heidari, E. (2013). Brian Friel's Translations: a Bourdieusian reading. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4): 741-745. Doi: 10.4304/jltr.4.4.741-745

Pue, G. H. & Shamsul, A. B. (2012). Peranakan as a Social Concept. (UKM Ethnic Studies Paper Series No. 20 (April). [E-book]. Institute Kajian Etnik, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor D.E., Malaysia. Retrieved from

Reay, D. (1998). Rethinking Social Class: Qualitative Perspectives on Class and Gender. Sociology-the Journal of The British Sociological Association - SOCIOLOGY, 32, 259–275. Retrieved from

Ritzer, G. (1999). Classical Sociological Theory: 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. Retrieved from

Sallaz, J. J., & Zavisca, J. (2007). Bourdieu in American Sociology, 1980–2004. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1): 21–41. Retrieved from

Savage, M. (2000). Class analysis and social transformation. Open University Press.

Sciulli, D., & Gerstein, D. (1985). Social Theory and Talcott Parsons in the 1980. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1): 369-387. Retrieved from

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.

Serban, S. (2011). Bourdieu's influence on contemporary thought in the social sciences. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 3(2): 248- 253. Retrieved from

Sewell Jr, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American journal of sociology, 98(1): 1-29. Retrieved from

Shamsul A. B. (1999). Identity contestation in Malaysia: A comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. AKADEMIKA, 55(July): 17–37. Retrieved from

Shamsul, A. B. & Athi, S. M. (2015). Ethnicity and identity formation: Colonial knowledge, colonial structures and transition. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia, Chapter 21. [E-book] (.267-278). Taylor and Francis Inc. Retrieved from

Shamsul, A. B. (1996a). Debating about identity in Malaysia: A discourse analysis. Southeast Asian Studies, 34(3): 476–499. Retrieved from

Shamsul, A. B. (1996b). ‘Nations-of-Intent in Malaysia’ in Asian Forms of the Nation, edited by Stein Tonnesson and Han Antlov, London: Curzon 1996 (323–347). Retrieved from'Nations-of-Intent_in_Malaysia'_in_Asian_Forms_of_the_Nation_edited_by_Stein_Tonnesson_and_Han_Antlov_London_Curzon_1996

Shamsul, A. B. (2001). A history of an identity, an identity of a history: The idea and practice of ‘Malayness’ in Malaysia reconsidered. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32(3): 355–366. Retrieved from

Shamsul, A. B. (2013). Politics of Language and Language of Politics: Theory and practice of the ‘Nation-of-Intent’ as articulated in Malaysia. UKM Ethnic Studies Paper Series No. 35.

Siddique, S., & Suryadinata, L. (1981). Bumiputra and Pribumi: Economic Nationalism (Indiginism) in Malaysia and Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 54(4): 662–687. Retrieved from

Singh, S. (2016). Political Field Dynamics and the Elite’s Interest in Democracy: Insights from the Political Elite’s Role in Consolidating Indian Democracy. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(2): 183–208. Retrieved from

Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class & gender: Becoming respectable (Vol. 51). Sage.

Spencer, S. (2006). Race and ethnicity: Culture, identity and representation. [e-book]. Retrieved from[Stephen_Spencer]_Race_and_Ethnicity_Identity,_Cu(BookFi.o g).pdf

Swartz, D. (2012). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.

Sweeney, A. (1987). A Full Hearing: Orality and Literacy in the Malay World. University of California, Berkeley, 1987). Retrieved from

Tan, S. (2011). Understanding the “Structure” and “Agency”; debate in the Social Sciences. Habitus (Undergraduate Journal of the Yale Sociology Department). Retrieved from

Tsekeris, C., & Lydaki, A. (2011). The micro-macro dilemma in sociology: Perplexities and perspectives. Sociologija, 53(1): 67-82. Doi: 10.2298/SOC1101067T

Turner, B. S., & Wainwright, S. P. (2003). Corps de ballet: The case of the injured ballet dancer. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(4): 269-288.

Vandenberghe, F. (2005). Book Review: The Archers: A Tale of Folk (Final Episode?). European Journal of Social Theory, 8(2):227–237. Retrieved from
How to Cite
Vega, S., Pandian, S. and Ahmad Pazil, N. H. (2021) “Comparison and Contrast between Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice and Shamsul’s Two Social Reality Approach in the Portrayal of Identity”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(7), pp. 293 - 304. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v6i7.869.