Exploring ESL Teachers’ Insights on Corrective Oral Feedback in a Malaysian Secondary Education Context

  • Izzuddin Mohd Fadzil Faculty of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
  • Nur Ehsan Mohd Said Faculty of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
Keywords: corrective feedback, oral feedback, ESL teachers, thematic analysis

Abstract

Feedback is one of the most significant elements in the process of teaching and learning. It serves as a tool to enhance students’ second language proficiency. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate how oral feedback is viewed and how it has been maneuvered to assist second language learner’s linguistic competence from the viewpoint of English teachers. Teachers’ perception of feedback is very important because it will determine the amount of feedback used in the process of teaching and learning. This is a qualitative study employing case study research design. It was conducted to 10 English language teachers from secondary schools in Malaysia The instrument used in this study was a semi-structured interview. Data collected from the interview were analyzed using thematic analysis. Several themes have been found during data analysis such as feedback as tool for motivation, oral feedback and learning from mistakes, students’ acceptance of teachers’ oral feedback and feedback as a medium to develop language proficiency. The result indicated that English teachers in Malaysia generally showed positive perception of oral feedback. Furthermore, teachers also reported to have noticed improvement in students’ language competence by listening to teachers’ feedback. Therefore, appropriate measure should be taken to ensure that teachers can provide effective oral feedback during teaching and learning.

Statistics
Abstract views: 35 , PDF downloads: 17

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akter, S. (2016). A survey report on teachers’ thought and awareness of using oral corrective feedback in the primary level: context Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).

Andrade, A. D. (2009). Interpretive research aiming at theory building: Adopting and adapting the case study design. The qualitative report, 14(1), 42.

Baz, H. (2016). Perceptions of English Instructors and Learners about Corrective Feedback. Online Submission, 1(1), 54-68.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1802-1811

Bitektine, A. (2008). Prospective case study design: qualitative method for deductive theory testing. Organizational research methods, 11(1), 160-180.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). What is the problem with feedback? Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well, 1-10.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.

Breakwell, G. M. (2000). Interviewing. In Research Methods in Psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 239-250). SAGE publications.

Brookhart, S., Moss, C., & Long, B. (2009). Promoting student ownership of learning through high-impact formative assessment practices. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(12), 52-67.

Capel, S., Leask, M and Turner, T. (1995) Learning to Teach in the Secondary School.5th edn. Oxon: Routledge

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.Cullen, R. (2002) ‘Supportive teacher talk: the importance of the F-move’ ELT Journal, 56(2)

Dessie, A. A., & Sewagegn, A. A. (2019). Moving beyond a Sign of Judgment: Primary School Teachers' Perception and Practice of Feedback. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 51-66.

Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333-343.

Ganapathy, M., Tan, D. A. L., & Phan, J. (2020). Impact of Written Corrective Feedback on Malaysian ESL Secondary Students’ Writing Performance. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 26(3).

Gardner, R. C. (1988). Attitudes and motivation. Annual review of applied linguistics, 9, 135-148

Harmer, J. (2007) The Practise of English Language Teaching. 4th edn. Essex: Pearson Education Limited 2007.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Hernández Méndez, E., & Reyes Cruz, M. D. R. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about oral corrective feedback and their practice in EFL classrooms. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 14(2), 63-75.

Kahraman, A., & Yalvac, F. (2015). EFL Turkish university students’ preferences about teacher feedback and its importance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 73-80.

Lee, H. H., Leong, A. P., & Song, G. (2016). Investigating teacher perceptions of feedback. Elt Journal, ccw047.

Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada journal, 1-16.

Lee, I., Mak, P., & Burns, A. (2016). EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom. Language teaching research, 20(2), 248-269.

London, M., & Sessa, V. I. (2006). Group feedback for continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review, 5(3), 303-329.

Lyster, Roy & Saito, Kazuya & Sato, Masatoshi. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching. 46. 1-40. 10.1017/S0261444812000365.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in second language acquisition, 37-66.

Mahmood, S. O. Mohamed, Sharifah Muzlia Binti Syed Mustafa, Zainab Mohd Noor, Mat Rahimi Yusof: Investigating Teachers’ Perceptions On Written Feed Back Practices In Malaysian Secondary Schools-- Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7).

Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher's verbal feedback on students’ response: A Malaysian esl classroom discourse analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 398-405.

Race, P., Brown, S. and Smith, B. (1996). 500 tips on assessment. 2nd edn. Oxon: RoutledgeFarmer.

Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers' oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46, 65-79.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.

Saeb, F. (2017). Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Do They Match? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(4), 32-44.

Sobhani, M., & Tayebipour, F. (2015). The effects of oral vs. written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners' essay writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1601.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.

Vasu, K., Ling, C. H., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). Malaysian tertiary level ESL students’ perceptions toward teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-assessment in their writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(5), 158-170
Published
2021-09-10
How to Cite
Mohd Fadzil, I. and Mohd Said, N. E. (2021) “Exploring ESL Teachers’ Insights on Corrective Oral Feedback in a Malaysian Secondary Education Context”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), pp. 504 - 512. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.993.
Section
Articles