Pengalaman Pembelajaran Guru Terhadap Bimbingan SISC+: Manfaatnya Kepada Amalan Pengajaran Guru dan Pencapaian Pelajar

  • Syamsul Bahri Andi Mapiare Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Sabah, Malaysia
  • Mohd. Zaki Ishak Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Sabah, Malaysia
  • Mazlan Mohd Yussof Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Sabah, Malaysia
  • Syahrul Nizam Salam Pusat Penataran Ilmu dan Bahasa, Kampus Antarabangsa Labuan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Malaysia
Keywords: program bimbingan guru, pembangunan profesional berterusan, pengalaman pembelajaran, amalan pengajaran guru, pencapaian pelajar

Abstract

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia telah memperkenalkan Pembimbing Pakar Peningkatan Sekolah (SISC+) atau School Improvement Specialist Coach pada tahun 2014 bertujuan memberikan bimbingan langsung kepada guru. Semenjak itu banyak kajian dilakukan terhadap program bimbingan SISC+, namun kajian yang ada masih belum cukup untuk membuktikan bahawa program bimbingan ini memberi manfaat langsung kepada kualiti pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) guru. Sehubungan dengan itu kajian ini diketengahkan dengan tujuan untuk meneroka manfaat program bimbingan SISC+ daripada perspektif guru yang pernah dibimbing. Seramai sepuluh orang guru yang pernah dibimbing oleh SISC+ telah dipilih secara bertujuan untuk ditemu bual menggunakan soalan separa berstruktur. Rakaman temu bual ini kemudian ditranskripsikan baris demi baris, dikod dan dikategorikan untuk memunculkan tema. Tema yang terhasil ini kemudian digunakan untuk menjawab tiga persoalan kajian iaitu cara bagaimana guru menggambarkan pengalaman yang dilalui sewaktu dibimbing oleh pegawai SISC+; cara bagaimana pengalaman sewaktu dibimbing ini memberi manfaat kepada amalan profesional guru; dan cara bagaimana pengalaman pembelajaran ini memberi kesan kepada pencapaian kelas yang diajar. Keputusan kajian mendapati guru menerima baik bimbingan SISC+ sebagai sebahagian daripada peluang pembelajaran yang memberi manfaat langsung kepada amalan profesional mereka, sekali gus memberi kesan kepada pencapaian pelajar bagi kelas yang diajar. Dapatan kajian ini telah membuktikan bahawa program bimbingan SISC+ adalah satu daripada cara untuk meningkatkan amalan pengajaran guru melalui latihan secara in situ di mana manfaatnya bukan sahaja kepada guru malah kepada pelajar. Kesimpulannya, bimbingan SISC+ perlu diperkasa sebagai satu daripada kaedah pembangunan profesional berterusan untuk guru.

Statistics
Abstract views: 41 , PDF downloads: 34

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative Data. New York: New York University Press.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Qualitative Research. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approach. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development, (June). Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf

Davrajoo, E., & Letchumanan, M. (2019). School improvement specialist coach plus (SISC+) programme: Impact on teachers’ pedagogical skills and students’ performance in mathematics classroom. ASM Science Journal, 12(1), 137–149.

Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). A Description of Instructional Coaching and its Relationship to Consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410802463296

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional Development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947

Gazali dan Sufean (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

Glense, C. (2011). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson.

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jacobs, J., Boardman, A., Potvin, A., & Wang, C. (2017). Understanding Teacher Resistance to Instructional Coaching. Professional Development in Education, 5257(November), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1388270

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Knight, J. (2009). Coaching: The key to Translating Research Into Practice Lies in Continuous, Job-embedded Learning With Ongoing Support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 18–22.

Kvale, S. (1996). An Introduction to Qulaitative Research Interveiwing. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/10.3.653

Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable. London: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209861

Lonsiong, D. U., & Dg Norizah, A. K. @ D. (2019). Interaksi Kepimpinan Perkongsian Mentor Melalui Motivasi Kerja Guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(7), 68–76.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2016). Raising Student Achievement Through Professional Development. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 1(1), 1–12.

Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Son.

Mohd Hilmi, A., & Jamil, A. (2017). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Program Pembimbing Pakar Peningkatan Sekolah (SISC+). Seminar on Transdisciplinary Education (STEd2017), 198–205. Retrieved from https://sted2017.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/1-24-mohd-hilmi-anwa-jamil-ahmad.pdf

Neuman, L. W. (2007). Basic of Social Research Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson International Edition.

Noel Jimbai, A. B., & Zamri, M. (2017). Penerimaan guru-guru bahasa melayu terhadap bimbingan dan pementoran jurulatih sisc+. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan.

Nur Syamsila, M. H., & Siti Mistima, M. (2017). Guided Teachers’ Perception on The Impact of The Mathematics’ School Improvement Specialist Coach. Seminar Pendidikan Serantau Ke-8, (2012), 724–728. Retrieved from https://seminarserantau2017.wordpress.com

Othman, L. (2017). Penyelidikan Kualitatif: Pengenalan Kepada Teori dan Metode (2nd ed.). Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

PADU. (2019). Laporan Tahunan 2018 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Qualitative Inquiry (Third). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_research_and_evaluation_meth.html?id=FjBw2oi8El4C

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidance for Nursing Practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Swarts, E. (2003). Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Methods. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Rozita Radhiah, S., Mohammad, B., & Azhar, M. S. (2016). Bimbingan dan Pementoran Berfokus oleh SISC+ BM: Impak Terhadap Kualiti Pengajaran Guru Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(2), 131–139.

Sarabiah, J. (2018). Persepsi, Amalan Dan Keberkesanan Bimbingan Jurulatih SISC+ dari Perspektif Guru Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu – JPBM (Malay Language Education Journal – MyLEJ), 8(1), 42–52.

Sarabiah, J., & Zamri, M. (2019). Amalan dan keberkesanan bimbingan jurulatih sisc+ dari perspektif guru bahasa melayu. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan.

Sediman, I. (2006). Review of Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews (3rd ed., Vol. 37). New York: Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/032390

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. The Guilford Press. New York: The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Syahrul Nizam Salam, Abdul Said Ambotang, Ghazali Hassan Sulaiman. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Penyumbang Terhadap Kendiri Pelajar Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam Di Sabah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Akademik, Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 3(34), 40-57

Syahrul Nizam Salam, Abdul Said Ambotang, Ghazali Hassan Sulaiman. (2019). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Ekonomi Dan Kefahaman Konsep Ekonomi Dengan Kendiri Pelajar Ekonomi. Jurnal Kurikulum, Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 4(34), 16-29

Teemant, A. (2014). A mixed-methods investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49(5), 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481362

Wan Fadhrurrahman, W. M. R., Al Amin, M., & Aziah, I. (2020). Professional Learning Community: Strategi Bimbingan Instruksional dan Alaman Profesional Guru. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(3), 38–54.

Wong, S. H., & Nur Ain Elzira, A. (2018). Bimbingan dan Pementoran Pembimbing Pakar Peningkatan Sekolah (SISC+) Menurut Perpspektif Guru Dibimbing (GDB). International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselin, 3(13), 57–72.

Yates, C., Partridge, H., & Bruce, C. (2012). Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research Volume, 36(112), 96–119.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative Research From Start to Finish (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Zubaidah Bibi, M. A., Hamidah, Y., & Wahizah, W. (2019). School Improvement Specialist Coaches Plus (SISC+) Teacher Coaching in Malaysia: Examining the Studies. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(6), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Zubaidah Bibi, M. A., Yamat, H., & Wahiza, W. (2020). Understanding Teachers’ Anxiety towards the Coaching Programme. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(7), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i7/7618
Published
2021-10-10
How to Cite
Andi Mapiare, S. B., Ishak, M. Z., Mohd Yussof, M. and Salam, S. N. (2021) “Pengalaman Pembelajaran Guru Terhadap Bimbingan SISC+: Manfaatnya Kepada Amalan Pengajaran Guru dan Pencapaian Pelajar”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(10), pp. 275 - 284. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i10.1126.
Section
Articles