Examining Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Thailand
Abstract
This study examines factors influencing students’ acceptance of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. A self-administered questionnaire gathered from 398 students from two universities in Thailand was analysed via multiple regression analysis using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. This approach was utilized to evaluate eleven hypotheses. The results revealed that perceived usefulness was the predominant factor that affected students’ actual use, readiness, and motivation to use online learning. The findings indicate that when the online learning system and online content are of good quality, students will perceive online learning as valuable, which will result in more actual usage. These students would accept that it is a suitable method for completing homework, obtaining information from the Internet, and learning the English language. This study makes significant contributions to advancing the understanding of factors influencing students’ acceptance of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand by applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) as the guiding principle. Thailand's online learning delivery system could benefit from these empirical findings, which could be used to develop guidelines to improve its effectiveness. Directions for future research are also presented.
Downloads
References
Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011
Albelbisi, N., & Yusop, F. (2019). Factors influencing learners’ self –regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20, 1–16. 10.17718/tojde.598191.
Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model,' Appl. Comput. Inform.,12(1), 27-50.
Alsuraihi, A.K., Almaqati, A.S., Abughanim, S.A., & Jastaniah, N.A. (2016). Use of social media in education among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Korean J Med Educ., 28(4), 343–354
Bhatiasevi, V., & Yoopetch, C. (2015). The determinants of intention to use electronic booking among young users in Thailand. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 23, 1–11.
Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.-M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136–1144.
Damm, C. (2016). Applying a community of inquiry instrument to measure student engagement in large online courses. Current Issues in Emerging E-Learning, 3(1), 138-173
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bogozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Science, 35(8): 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528‐018‐9179‐z
Gwamba,G., Renken, J., Nampijja, D., Mayende, G., & Muyinda, P. B. (2018). Contextualisation of eLearning systems in higher education institutions. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (pp. 44–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐75175‐7_6
Harrison, R., Hutt, I., Thomas‐Varcoe, C., Motteram, G., Else, K., Rawlings, B., & Gemmell, I. (2017). A cross‐ sectional study to describe academics' confidence, attitudes, and experience of online distance learning in higher education. Journal of Educators Online, 14(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1150576
Hartnell, B. (2016). The Effects of Standards-Based Grading and Differentiated Reassessment on the Metacognition, Motivation, and End of Course Assessments of 9th Grade American History Students. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
Kim, S. H. (2014). A Study on Adoption Factors of Korean Smartphone Users : A Focus on TAM ( Technology Acceptance Model ) and UTAUT ( Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ). Advanced Science and Technology, 57, 27–30.
Lee, S., & Kim, B. G. (2009). Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191–201.
Hsieh, J. J. P., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor-student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Comput Educ., 57(3), 2025–2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002
Imsa-ard, P. (2020). Thai university students’ perceptions towards the abrupt transition to ‘forced’ online learning in the COVID-19 situation. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 43(3), 30-44.
Joo Y. J., Lim, K. Y., Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictor in a structural model. Computer & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50744/
Knowles, E, & Kerman, D. (2007). An investigation of student attitude and motivation toward online learning. Student Motivation, 2, 70-82.
Kuama, S., & Intharaksa, U. (2016). Is Online Learning Suitable for All English Language Students? PASAA, 52, 53-82.
Linjawi, A. I., & Alfadda, L. S. (2018). Students’ perception, attitudes, and readiness toward online learning in dental education in Saudi Arabia: A cohort study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 855-863.
Mala, D. (2021). COVID hinders education again. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2045015/covid-hinders-education-again
Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(34), 1-13.
Otieno, O. C., Liyala, S., Odongo, B. C., & Abeka, S. (2016). Theory of reasoned action as an underpinning to technological innovation adoption studies. World Journal of Computer Application and. Technology, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.13189/wjcat.2016.040101
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). McGrawHill
Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, D. V. S., & Saravanakumar, D. A. (2020). E‐Learning during lockdown of Covid‐19 pandemic: A global perspective. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 13.
Rissa, J. (2014). An empirical study on the e-learning acceptance among the Finnish labor. Master thesis, Aalto University.
Rohman, M., Marji, Sudjimat, D. A., Sugandi, R. M., & Nurhadi, D. (2020). Online learning in higher education during Covid‐19 pandemic: Students' perceptions. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 12(2s), 3644–3651.
Rovai, A. & Lucking, R. (2003). Sense of community in a higher education television-based distance education program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2),5-16. DOI:10.1007/BF02504523
Salloum, S. A. (2018). Investigating students’ acceptance of e-learning system in higher educational environments in the UAE: Applying the extended technology acceptance model (TAM). A dissertation submitted for MSc Informatics, the British University in Dubai.
Sánchez, R. A. & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that infuence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computer in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632-1640.
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 341–372). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50034-9
Scott, K. M. (2016). Change in university teachers' elearning beliefs and practices: A longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 582–598.
Selvarajah, K. Krishnan, T. & Hajariah, H. (2017). E-learning readiness on bumiputera SME’s intention for adoption of online entrepreneurship training in Malaysia. Management, 7(1), 35-39.
Shroff, R. Vogel, D. Coombes, J., & Lee, F. S. L. (2007). Student e-learning intrinsic motivation: A qualitative analysis. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 19(19),241-260. Doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01912
The Star (2021). Bangkok extends lockdown on Covid-19 risky venues until May 17. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/2021/05/08/bangkok-extends-lockdown-on-covid-19-risky-venues-until-may-17.
Thomas, D. (2020). Thailand university students’ e-learning behavior during the global pandemic. Human Behavior, Development and Society, 21(4), 57-65.
Thongsri, N. & Bao, Y. (2019). What motivates learners’ intention to use Blackboard Mobile Learning (BML)?: Evidence from Thailand. 2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media),314-319. https://doi.org/10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00069
Thongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019). Investigating factors affecting learner's perception toward online learning: Evidence from ClassStart application in Thailand. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1243–1258.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M. (2004). Less is sometimes more: Goal content matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 755-764.















