Spratly Disputes and Suggested Methods to Overcome the Conflict
Abstract
The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea has been the most contested maritime area in recent years. This writing intends to understand the disputes happening around the South China Sea which specify on Spratly Island which is in hot area and being claimed by many countries surrounded the island. Hence, ASEAN as the supranational institution that involves with the countries within South East Asia responsible to unite and overcome the conflict within the area to avoid any subsequent that could worsen in future. As a representation institution among the South East Asia, ASEAN multilateral has suggested initiative such as pushing for the Code of Conduct among the claimant countries. The writing also studied about on ASEAN countries claim on the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea enhanced our understanding on how to pursue national interest through the law of the sea and conflict resolution. I choose this type of methodology which is Qualitative and Quantitative method. For data collection, in-depth interviews and desktop research were carried out. Quantitative method usually uses numbers or numerical data to explain a phenomenon. It involves seeking ways to validate hypothesis and pre-plan with variables on how to explain occurrences. However, the writing uses qualitative method. The multilateral regional organization like ASEAN has played substantial role in managing and solving the Spratly Islands dispute in the SCS. This writing will analyse the role of ASEAN and the involvement of ASEAN countries in various talks and agreements on in the Spratly Islands dispute.
Downloads
References
Bean, H. & Shao, P. (2015). Reconfiguring Public Relations with China. SAGE Publishing.
Bercovitch, J. & Oishi, M. (2010), International Conflict in the Asia-Pacific: Patterns, Consequences and Management. Routledge.
Brierly, J. (1963). The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace. Clarendon Press.
Caballero, M. (2005). Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN Way. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Coicaud, J. & Wheeler, N. (2008). National Interest and International Solidarity. United Nations University Press.
Hasenclever, A. (1997). Theories of International Regimes and Review. International Studies, 26(1), 3-33.
He, K. (2008). Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia. SAGE Publishing.
Jacobson, M. (2008). Sanctions against Iran: A Promising Struggle: In The Washington Quarterly, 13(3).
Keohane, R. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. Oxford Universiti Press.
Keyuan, Z. (2005). Implementing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in East Asia: Issues and Trends. Singapore Year Book of International Law. Commonlii. http://www.commonlii.org/sg/journals/SGYrBkIntLaw/2005/5.pdf
Kratochwil, F & Gerard, J (1986). International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. Cambridge Universiti Press.
Li, N. (2016). China tests two new airfields in South China Sea. Beijing Review. http://www.bjreview.com/Nation/201607/t20160714_800062385.html.
Oishi, M (2018). Reframing the Management of the South China Sea Dispute: The Mediation Regime System, Alliance System and Hybrid System. Universiti Malaysia Sabah Internation Relations Program Working Paper No.1. (pp. 1-15)
Oishi, M. (2016a). The ASEAN Way of Conflict Management Under Challenge. Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Towards a New ASEAN Way of Conflict Management. Springer
Oishi, M. (2016b). The South China Sea Dispute: Formation of a Mediation Regime and Challenges for Management. In Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Towards a New ASEAN Way of Conflict Management. Springer.
Ramsbotham, O. (2011). Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge
Ruland, J. (2011). Southeast Asian Regionalism and Global Governance: “Multilateral Utility” or “Hedging Utility”. ISEAS Publishing.
Rustandi, A. (2016). The South China Sea Dispute: Opportunities for ASEAN to enhance its policies in order to achieve resolution. Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers. USNA. https://www.usna.edu/NAFAC/_files/round_tables/white/Rustandi_IPSP.pdf.
Sikander, T. (2011). Conflict and Conflict Resolution. Margalla Papers. NDU.https://ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/margalla-paper/Margalla-Papers-2011/07-Conflict-&-Conflict-Resolution.pdf.
Xavier, C. (1999). Structure, Politics and the Diffusion of Employment Practices in Multinationals, Fifth Edition. SAGE Publishing.
Xuechan, M. (2016). The South China Sea Dispute. Perspective of International Law.















