Comparative Analysis of Reconciliation Procedures in Syariah and Civil Courts

  • Aishah Mohd Nor Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
  • Nurhidayah Muhammad Hashim Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
  • Nur Ezan Rahmat Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
  • Noraini Md. Hashim Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia, P.O. Box 10, 50728 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Zuliza Kusrin Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
  • Latifah Abdul Majid Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
  • Norai'nan Bahari Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Islam Selangor, Bandar Seri Putra, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Keywords: Family Law, Civil, Syariah, Reconciliation, Divorce

Abstract

Reconciliation in divorce proceedings has been introduced in family courts in dealing with application for divorce. This study focuses on the functions, the appointment of committees, and the procedures of reconciliation in Shariah courts and Civil courts to compare the practice of laws between Section 47(5) to (17) of the Islamic Family Law (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 (IFLSE 2003) and Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA 1976). This study was conducted through doctrinal and comparative legal research of the existing literature, including academic articles, statutes, and case laws relating to reconciliation. The findings establish the similarities and differences of both statutes. This study suggests that a reconciliation before a legal proceeding may employ a subtler approach for out-of-court negotiation leading to potentially better results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul, H. D. N. (2005). Role of the Conciliatory Committee and Hakam (Arbitrator): The Practice and Provisions of the Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. In Meeting the Challenges of Law in Asia–Second Asian Law Institute (ASLI) Conference, Singapore.

Bouheraoua, S. (2010). Foundation of Mediation in Islamic law and Its Contemporary Application. Mediation in Malaysia: The Law and Practice, ed. Mohammad Naqib Ishan Jan, Ashgar Ali & Ali Mohamed. Petaling Jaya: LexisNexis, 385-396.

C v. A [1998] 4 CLJ 38

Chin Pei Lee v Yap Kin Choong

Dahalan, H.M. (2019). Kuliah Penyelesaian Pertikaian Alternatif: Penimbangtaraan. Selangor: Kolej Universiti Islam.

Finer, M. (1974). Report on the Committee on One-Parent Families. Cmnd 5629. London, HMSO.

Ghazali, N. M., & Ismail, W. A. F. W. (2006). Nusyuz, Shiqaq dan Hakam Menurut Al-Quran, Sunnah dan Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam. Penerbit Kolej Universiti Islam Malaysia.

Islamic Family Law (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003

Jennifer Patricia Thomas v Calvin Martin Victor David

Kiranjit Kaur Kalwant Singh v Chandok Narinderpal Singh

L v C [2018] 1 LNS 1090

Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976

Majid, M. Z. B. H. A., & Azahari, R. H. (1989). Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam: Konsep dan Perlaksanaannya di Malaysia. Karya Abazie.

Majid, M. Z. H. A. (1993). Kursus Perkahwinan dan Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam. Dasar Padu.

Md Abdul Salam, N. Z., & Mat Nayan, M. N. (2021). Penglibatan Jawatankuasa Pendamai Dan Hakam dalam Penyelesaian Tuntutan Perceraian. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies (JCIS), 7(2), 207-233.

Narowi, M., Noor, N. F. M., & Khairundin, S. A. A. (2021). Hakam dan Aplikasinya dalam Penyelesaian Kes Perceraian di Mahkamah Syariah Negeri Selangor. Selangor Humaniora Review, 5(1), 19-29.

Razimah Haneem v. Yusuf bin Hasbullah (1993) 9 JH 237

Robert Stevenson Kay v Stephanie Tan Min Chiu & Anor [2020] 1 LNS 1005

Rosilah v Abdul Rahman (1991) 8 JH 249

Vivian Lee Shea Li v Sia Chong Liang

Zainab v Abdul Latif (1991) 8 JH 297

Published
2022-10-31
Section
Articles