The Impact of AI-Generated Art on the Creative Process of Painting Artists: A Conceptual Paper

  • Xiaoxiao Wang College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Rainal Hidayat Bin Wardi College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Rusmawati Binti Ghazali College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Generated Art, Creative Process, Chinese Background, Self-Efficacy, Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

This conceptual paper explores how AI-generated art tools impact the creative processes of painters in Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, China. By constructing a conceptual framework, the study analyzes the effects of AI tool dependency and technology acceptance on creative inspiration, efficiency, innovation, and satisfaction, with self-efficacy considered a moderating factor. Based on existing literature, it can be inferred that current research lacks empirical studies on different types of painters who use AI-generated art, including in China. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the potential role of AI in artistic creation, offering a theoretical foundation and guidance for future research. The findings of this conceptual paper contribute to understanding the influence of AI on artists' creative processes and promote the integration of artistic creation with modern technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Audry, S. (2021). Art in the age of machine learning. MIT Press.

Brand, N., Odom, W., & Barnett, S. (2021). A design inquiry into introspective AI: Surfacing opportunities, issues, and paradoxes. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (DIS '21) (pp. 1603–1618). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462000

Caramiaux, B., & Fdili Alaoui, S. (2022). “Explorers of unknown planets”: Practices and politics of artificial intelligence in visual arts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), Article 477. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555578

Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18(2), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Cotroneo, P., & Hutson, J. (2023). Generative AI tools in art education: Exploring prompt engineering and iterative processes for enhanced creativity. Metaverse, 4(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.54517/m.v4i1.2164

Crimaldi, F., & Leonelli, M. (2023). AI and the creative realm: A short review of current and future applications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.01795

Dalebroux, A., Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2008). Short-term mood repair through art-making: Positive emotion is more effective than venting. Motivation and Emotion, 32(4), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9105-1

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Duan, X. (2023). A study of Chinese and Western landscape painting from the comparative perspective. Frontiers in Art Research, 5(13). https://doi.org/10.25236/far.2023.051301

Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Herman, L., Mahari, R., Frank, M. R., Groh, M., Schroeder, H., Smith, A., Akten, M., Fjeld, J., Farid, H., Leach, N., Pentland, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive (arXiv:2306.04141). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.04141

Gao, Z., Man, S., & Wang, A. (2022). AI art and design creation industry: The transformation from individual production to human-machine symbiosis. 2022 World Automation Congress (WAC). https://doi.org/10.23919/wac55640.2022.9934515

Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 27). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2014/file/5ca3e9b122f61f8f06494c97b1afccf3-Paper.pdf

Graham Dove, K., Halskov, K., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2017). UX design innovation: Challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17) (pp. 278–288). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025739

Gruber, H., & Oepen, R. (2017). Emotion regulation strategies and effects in art-making: A narrative synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 59, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.12.006

Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003

Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026

Nitsche, M., & Weisling, A. (2019). When is it not craft? Materiality and mediation when craft and computing meet. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '19) (pp. 683–689). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295651

Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 8748–8763. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a.html

Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., & Sutskever, I. (2021). Zeroshot text-to-image generation. International Conference on Machine Learning, 8821–8831.

Ren, X., & Sun, M. (2011). Artistic urbanization: Creative industries and creative control in Beijing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01078.x

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models (arXiv:2112.10752). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.10752

Rosado, P., Fernandez, R., & Reverter, F. (2021). GANs and artificial facial expressions in synthetic portraits. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(4), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5040063

Scurto, H., Caramiaux, B., & Bevilacqua, F. (2021). Prototyping machine learning through diffractive art practice. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '21) (pp. 2013–2025). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462163

Shi, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence for art creation with image style. Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology, 44, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v44i.7198

Tanugraha, S. (2023). Review of using artificial intelligence-generating images: Exploring material ideas from MidJourney to improve vernacular designs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture, 2(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v2i2.7537

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html

Verger, N. B., Shankland, R., & Sudres, J. (2021). High artistic achievements and low emotion dysregulation: The moderating and mediating role of self-compassion. Creativity Research Journal, 34(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1962104

Wajid, M. S., Terashima‐Marin, H., Najafirad, P., & Wajid, M. A. (2023). Deep learning and knowledge graph for image/video captioning: A review of datasets, evaluation metrics, and methods. Engineering Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12785

Xi, W., Haitao, D., Hamidon, A., & Nor, A. (2023). A brief discussion on the significance of material mediation to mixed media painting. British Journal of Arts and Humanities, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.0230990106

Xing, L., Razak, H., Binti, L., & Noh, M. (2023). The aesthetic development of traditional Chinese landscape painting in contemporary landscape painting. Art and Performance Letters, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040709

Yin, S. (2022). Analysis on the inner relationship between computer digital painting and traditional painting. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, Article 9462510, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9462510

Zhang, N. (2021). Being an artist is hard: Navigating the dynamics of money and power. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3848647

Zhao, Y., Samuel, R. D. J., & Manickam, A. (2022). Research on the application of computer image processing technology in painting creation. Journal of Interconnection Networks, 22(Supp05). https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219265921470204

Published
2025-02-27
How to Cite
Wang, X., Wardi, R. H. and Ghazali, R. (2025) “The Impact of AI-Generated Art on the Creative Process of Painting Artists: A Conceptual Paper”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(2), p. e003110. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v10i2.3110.
Section
Articles