The Relationship Between Peer Relationships and Classroom Engagement Among Undergraduate Private College Students

  • Zhiyuan Yang Faculty of Education and Sports Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • Connie Shin Connie Cassy Ompok Faculty of Education and Sports Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Keywords: Peer relationships, Classroom Engagement, Undergraduate Students, Private College

Abstract

Classroom engagement is a key determinant of student learning and academic success, yet relatively little attention has been paid to the role of peer relationships in shaping engagement levels within private higher education settings in China. This study aims to examine the relationship between peer relationships and classroom engagement among undergraduate students at a private university in Qingdao, Shandong Province. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 17,122 students from a private undergraduate college in Qingdao, Shandong, China, yielding 534 valid responses. The average peer relationships score was 3.29, suggesting a relatively harmonious relationship among students. Simple linear regression analysis revealed that peer relationships positively predicted classroom engagement, explaining 30.3% of its variance (R²= 0.303, Adjusted R²= 0.302). Additionally, the hierarchical multiple regression results indicate that gender (β=0.096, p=0.007) plays a significant moderating role in the influence of peer relationships on classroom engagement, and similarly, grade (β=0.080, p=0.023) exerts a significant moderating effect on the relationship between peer relationships and classroom engagement. Moreover, the moderating effects of gender and grade on the relationship between peer relationships and classroom engagement are more pronounced among female students. These findings highlight the importance of fostering positive peer interactions and considering gender- and grade-specific needs when designing engagement-enhancing interventions in private college contexts in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adignam, C. A. (2021). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. Adignam Publications. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_18

Al-Obaydi, L. H., Shakki, F., Tawafak, R. M., Pikhart, M., & Ugla, R. L. (2023). What I know, what I want to know, what I learned: Activating EFL college students' cognitive, behavioural, and emotional engagement through structured feedback in an online environment. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1083673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083673

Althubaiti A. (2022). Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers. Journal of general and family medicine, 24(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.600

Aydoğdu, F. (2022). Developing a peer relationship scale for adolescents: A validity and reliability study. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.109461

Bekkering, E., & Ward, T. L. (2020). Class participation and student performance: A tale of two courses. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(6), 86–98. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1258148.pdf

Bru, E., Virtanen, T., Kjetilstad, V., & Niemiec, C. P. (2019). Gender differences in the strength of association between perceived support from teachers and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659404

Büchele, S. (2021). Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: The role of classroom engagement dimensions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754330

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th edition). London: Rutledge/Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Department of Education of Shandong Province. (2024,July 4). 2023 Shandong Education Development Statistical Bulletin. Shandong Provincial Department of Education. http://edu.shandong.gov.cn/art/2024/7/4/art_11994_10332156.html

Eccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part 1 commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6

Gallardo, L. O., Barrasa, A., & Guevara-Viejo, F. (2016). Positive peer relationships and academic achievement across early and midadolescence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(10), 1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.10.1637

Gristy, C. (2012). The central importance of peer relationships for student engagement and well-being in a rural secondary school. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(3), 225-240, https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2012.671343

Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2021). Measuring classroom engagement in higher education: A systematic review of survey instruments. Educational Research Review, 33, 100393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100393

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192

Jacobson, L. T., & Burdsal, C. A. (2012). Academic performance in middle school: Friendship influences. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 2(3). https://journals.ku.edu/gjcpp/article/view/20901

Kilday, J. E., & Ryan, A. M. (2024). The intermediary role of peer relationships between teachers and students' classroom engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 92, 101649. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13006

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283

Lam, S. F., & Hagger, M. S. (2021). Application of self-determination theory to improve students’ learning outcomes in higher education. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1846398

Li, J., Yuan, J., & Hu, Y. (2019). Measurement and heterogeneity of undergraduate dormitory peer relationships: A survey based on education majors at a certain university. Chongqing Higher Education Research(6), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2019.06.011

Liang, M., Abdullah, M. K., & Ompok, C. (2025). Work concerns and teacher effectiveness in China: The moderating role of cultural norms. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(3), Article e003277. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i3.3277

Liang, T., & Zheng, H. (2014). The influence of peer acceptance on academic achievement: Compensatory and moderated mediating effects. Psychological Research, 7(6), 91–96.

Ompok, C. C., & Teo, L. (2021). Perceived organizational support and teacher motivation. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(10). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i10.1118

Qinghua, L., & Ompok, C. S. (2022). The influence of social support on child-parent relationship among Chinese mothers of preschoolers in Penampang, Sabah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11), Article e001880. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i11.1880

Qiu, J., Kesebir, S., Günaydin, G., Selçuk, E., & Wasti, S. A. (2022). Gender differences in interpersonal trust: Disclosure behavior, benevolence sensitivity, and workplace implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 169, Article 104119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104119

Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886

Rautanen, P., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2021). Primary school students’ perceived social support in relation to study engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00492-3

Rautanen, R., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2022). Dynamics between perceived social support and study engagement among primary school students: A three-year longitudinal survey. Social Psychology of Education, 25(6), 1481–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09734-2

Shao, Y., Kang, S., Lu, Q., & Zhang, X. (2024). How peer relationships affect academic achievement among junior high school students: The chain mediating roles of learning motivation and learning engagement. BMC Psychology, 12, 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01780 -z

Shao, Y., Sharif, S., & Ompok, C. S. (2025). Revisiting teacher commitment: A bibliometric analysis based on CNKI and Scopus databases. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(2), Article e003239. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i2.3239

State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2023, January 15). CPC Central Committee State Council issues outline of strategic plan for expanding domestic demand (2022–2035). China.gov.cn. https://english.www.gov.cn/

Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., & Huang, Y. (2024). School climate, student engagement and academic achievement across school sectors in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 667–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00618-8

Trowler, V., & Bamber, V. (2020). Student engagement redefined: Exploring a holistic perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1603413

Tu, J.-C., & Chu, K.-H. (2020). Analyzing the relevance of peer relationship, learning motivation, and learning effectiveness—Design students as an example. Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104061

Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Koh, C., & Tan, O. S. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students' motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983

Wang, G., & Hu, W. (2021). Peer relationships and college students’ cooperative tendencies: Roles of interpersonal trust and social value orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656412

Wang, Y. (2022). Factors influencing college students' cognitive engagement in the classroom and countermeasures. Advances in Education, 12(5), 1636-1644. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2022.125253

Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2021). Peer social acceptance and academic achievement: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000468

Yan, H. (2018). An introduction to parental psychology. Hunan Education Press.

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680

Published
2025-04-18
How to Cite
Yang, Z. and Ompok, C. S. C. C. (2025) “The Relationship Between Peer Relationships and Classroom Engagement Among Undergraduate Private College Students”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(4), p. e003271. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v10i4.3271.
Section
Articles