The U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy: Evolution and Future Prospects

  • Hugo Gabriel de Souza Leao Machado Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima Campus, 739-8524, Higashihiroshima-city, Hiroshima, Japan. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-9354
Keywords: United States, Indo-Pacific Region, Foreign Policy, National Security Strategy, Offensive Realism

Abstract

In 2017, the U.S. government adopted the Indo-Pacific concept to guide its strategy toward Asia. This initiative emerged from a decade of increasing U.S. engagement with military allies and strategic partners in the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. The primary objective of the Indo-Pacific strategy is to strengthen political and military ties between the United States and countries within this expansive area while countering China’s growing influence. This paper will examine the progress of the U.S. National Security Strategy toward Asia in the 21st century and evaluate its possibilities for President Donald Trump’s second administration. We will revisit the theoretical framework of offensive realism theory and its prospects for the rising competition between the United States and China. We argue that the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy will continue to advance in the coming years, primarily through close cooperation with India, a key U.S. strategic partner. However, contrary to the expectations of the offensive realism, Washington will not lead a military balancing coalition in Asia to contain Beijing. Instead, the U.S. government will likely demand more responsibilities from its Asian allies, particularly Japan, requiring a greater commitment to maintaining a favourable regional balance of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baldwin, R. (2024, January 17). China is the world’s sole manufacturing superpower: A line sketch of the rise. CEPR. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/china-worlds-sole-manufacturing-superpower-line-sketch-rise

Berkofsky, A. (2022). The US-japan security alliance – ready and equipped to deal with China? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4032742

Biden, J. (2022). National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/8-November-Combined-PDF-for-Upload.pdf

Bitzinger, R. A. (2016). The PLA Navy and the US Navy in the Asia-pacific: Anti-access/area denial vs Air Sea Battle. In A. T. Tan (Ed.), Handbook of US–China Relations (pp. 398-411). Edward Elgar Publishing

Bush, G. W. (2002). The National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nss/2002/nss1.html

Bush, G. W. (2006). The National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House. https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss2006.pdf

Buzan, B. (2012, June 6). Asia: A Geopolitical Reconfiguration. IFRI. https://www.ifri.org/en/articles-politique-etrangere/asia-geopolitical-reconfiguration

Chorzempa, M., Lovely, M. E., & Wan, Y. C. (2024). The rise of US economic sanctions on China: Analysis of a new PIIE dataset. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, 24-14. https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2024/rise-us-economic-sanctions-china-analysis-new-piie-dataset

Haenle, P. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of the Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy vs. the Trump Administration’s. East Asian Policy, 14(04), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793930522000289

Holton, G. (2022). The real threat of the United States’ 800 foreign bases. Guardian (Sydney), 7. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.597125162347853

Hu, W., & Meng, W. (2020). The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response. China Review, 20(3), 143–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26928115

Kane, T. (2024). History of U.S. Troop Deployments, 1950-2023. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5027690

Kishida, F. (2022). National Security of Japan. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/221216anzenhoshou/nss-e.pdf

Kurosaki, M. (2018, August 23). Japan’s evolving position on the use of force in collective self-defense. Lawfare. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/japans-evolving-position-use-force-collective-self-defense

Le Thu, H. (2020). Southeast Asia and Indo-Pacific Concepts: From Resistance to Reticence to Reaction. Security Challenges, 16(3), 53–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26924340

Li, L. (2018). China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “made-in-china 2025” and “industry 4.0.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028

Marston, H. (2017). Examining the US Rebalance in Southeast Asia after Obama. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 18(1), 47-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/gia.2017.0008.

Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics (3rd Ed.). WW Norton.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2021, October 19). The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2021-10-19/inevitable-rivalry-cold-war

Nordin, A. H., & Weissmann, M. (2018). Will Trump make China great again? The belt and road initiative and international order. International Affairs, 94(2), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix242.

Obama, B. (2010). National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf

Obama, B. (2015). National Security Strategy. Washington: The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf

Ollapally, D., & Verma, R. (2023). Separately together: Indian and American approaches to China during the Trump era. India Review, 22(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2023.2180913

Pandit, R. (2018, September 7). COMCASA will pave way for armed drones, sharing of Op Intel. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/comcasawill-pave-way-for-armed-drones-real-time-sharing-of-operational-intelligence/articleshow/65710226.cms

Prasad, J. (2020). India, the United States, and the Indo-Pacific region. In J. I. Bekkevold & S. Kalyanamaram (Eds.), India’s Great Power Politics (pp. 181-207). Routledge India.

Rajagopalan, R. (2017). India's strategic choices: China and the balance of power in Asia (Vol. 14). New Delhi: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Satoru, M. (2021). The Biden Administration’s First Year in the Indo-Pacific: Balancing, Order-Building and Managing Competition with China. Asia-Pacific Review, 28(2), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2022.2026635

Schipani, A., & Kaushik, K. (2025, January 28). Donald Trump pushes India to buy more US weapons in trade rebalancing. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/a33cdadb-5e09-4dd1-a9be-f995466338b6

Seligman, R. G. (2019, November 16). Trump asks Tokyo to quadruple payments for U.S. troops in Japan. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/15/trump-asks-tokyo-quadruple-payments-us-troops-japan/

SIPRI (2024). SIPRI Yearbook 2024, Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2024

Smith, J. (2019). Modi 2.0: Navigating Differences and Consolidating Gains in India–US Relations. The Heritage Foundation, 5, 1-31.

Smith, J. M. (2019, August 5). Modi 2.0: Navigating differences and consolidating gains in India–U.S. relations. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/modi-20-navigating-differences-and-consolidating-gains-india-us-relations

Tan, S. S. (2020). Consigned to hedge: South-East Asia and America’s ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz227

Tellis, A. (2017). Protecting American Primacy in the Indo-Pacific, testimony before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2017/04/protecting-american-primacy-in-the-indo-pacific?lang=en

The World Bank. (2024a). World Development Indicators: Structure of value added [Data table]. The World Bank. Retrieved from https://wdi.worldbank.org/table/4.2

The World Bank. (2024b). World Development Indicators: Population dynamics [Data table]. The World Bank. Retrieved from https://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.1

Tian, N., Da Silva, D. L., Liang, X., & Scarazzato, L. (2024). Trends in World Military Expenditure 2023. SIPRI. https://doi.org/10.55163/bqga2180

Trump, D. (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: The White House. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (2024). Two Years of Indo-Pacific strategic results: Strengthening Indo-Pacific Commerce for a prosperous future. Washington: U.S. Government. https://www.commerce.gov/news/fact-sheets/2024/02/two-years-indo-pacific-strategic-results-strengthening-indo-pacific

U.S. Department of State. (2025a). U.S. Security Cooperation with India. Washington: U.S. Government. https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-india

U.S. Department of State. (2025b). Joint Statement by the Quad Foreign Ministers. Washington: U.S. Government. https://www.state.gov/joint-statement-by-the-quad-foreign-ministers/#:~:text=We%20also%20strongly%20oppose%20any,reliable%20and%20resilient%20supply%20chains.

Vijayalakshmi, K. (2017). India–US Strategic Partnership: Shifting American Perspectives on Engaging India. International Studies, 54(1-4), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881718791403

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGrawHill.

Wei, Z. (2022). The evolution of the ‘QUAD’: driving forces, impacts, and prospects. China Int Strategy Rev. 4, 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-022-00119-w7

Wezeman, P. D., Djokic, K., George, M., Hussain, Z., & Wezeman, S. T. (2024). Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2023. SIPRI. https://doi.org/10.55163/pbrp4239

Published
2025-03-17
How to Cite
de Souza Leao Machado, H. (2025) “The U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy: Evolution and Future Prospects”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10(3), p. e003286. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v10i3.3286.
Section
Articles