An Empirical Study on Consumer Behavioral Intentions towards Alipay in China
Abstract
In recent years, mobile payments have revolutionized the way transactions are conducted in China through innovative methods. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of consumers' perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived trust, perceived compatibility and consumers' attitude on consumers' behavioural intention towards Alipay, by using an extended version of the technology acceptance model (TAM). The method used in this study was quantitative, and the data was collected from 384 users in China. In sample selection, the non-probability sampling method is adopted. The analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modelling and Smart PLS tools. The results show that consumers' usage attitude significantly affects their behavioural intention. Perceived usefulness, perceived trust and perceived compatibility all significantly affect consumers' usage attitudes and behavioural intentions. Perceived ease of use may influence attitudes toward usage but does not significantly impact usage intention.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324.
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185–204.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277.
Apau, R., & Koranteng, F. N. (2019). Impact of cybercrime and trust on the use of e-commerce technologies: An application of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 228–245.
Aslam, W., Ham, M., & Arif, I. (2017). Consumer behavioral intentions towards mobile payment services: An empirical analysis in Pakistan. Trziste = Market, 29(2), 161–176.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Chan, S. H., & Lay, Y. F. (2021). Effects of attitude, self-efficacy beliefs, and motivation on behavioural intention in teaching science. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 219–262.
Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M. M., & Trkman, P. (2016). Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—Applying an extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90, 22–31.
Davis, F. D. (1989a). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D. (1989b). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 205–219). Emerald Publishing.
Dewan, S. G., & Chen, L. D. (2005). Mobile payment adoption in the US: A cross-industry, cross-platform solution. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 1(2), 4–28.
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Jawad, A. I., Parvin, T., & Hosain, M. S. (2022). Intention to adopt mobile-based online payment platforms in three Asian countries: An application of the extended Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 5(1), 92–113.
Obaid, T. (2021). Predicting mobile banking adoption: An integration of TAM and TPB with trust and perceived risk. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Oke, J., Akinkunmi, W. B., & Etebefia, S. O. (2019). Use of correlation, tolerance, and variance inflation factor for multicollinearity test. Global Scientific Journals, 7(5), 652–659.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414.
Ooi, K. B., & Tan, G. W. H. (2016). Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 33–46.h
Payment and Clearing Association of China. (2023). 2023 Mobile Payment User Usage Survey Report. Retrieved from https://www.mpaypass.com.cn/news/202404/20183720.html
Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001). Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions—Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 208–222.
Rahmawati, H. R., Hudayah, S., Riyadi, S. S., & Hariyadi, S. (2022). Does self-efficacy affect intention to use of e-wallet in Generations Y and Z? Journal of Research and Opinion, 9(6), 3136–3140.
Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis. Pearson.
Ramos-de-Luna, I., Montoro-Ríos, F., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2016). Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: An acceptance model approach. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 14(2), 293–314.
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.
Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209–216.
Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, F. N., Rahim, N. F. A., Khoshkam, M., & Mirzaei, M. (2023). Determinants of intention to use e-wallet: Personal innovativeness and propensity to trust as moderators. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(12), 2361–2373.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347.
Van der Heijden, H., & Verhagen, T. (2004). Online store image: Conceptual foundations and empirical measurement. Information & Management, 41(5), 609–617.
Wiese, M., & Humbani, M. (2020). Exploring technology readiness for mobile payment app users. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(2), 123–142.
Yang, H. D., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: Revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19–31.
Yuen, K. F., Cai, L., Qi, G., & Wang, X. (2021). Factors influencing autonomous vehicle adoption: An application of the technology acceptance model and innovation diffusion theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(5), 505–519.