Comparing Blended and Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning in EFL Argumentative Writing

  • Yuanyuan Ou Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Adelina Asmawi Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Shanina Sharatol Ahmad Shah Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords: Blended collaborative learning, Face-to-face learning, EFL argumentative writing, Dialogic argumentation, Collaborative writing

Abstract

This study examines the effects of an integrated collaborative approach combining dialogic argumentation and collaborative writing on EFL students’ argumentative writing in blended and face-to-face learning environments. A total of 120 EFL undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either a blended or a face-to-face condition and participated in a ten-session intervention involving structured dialogic argumentation followed by collaborative writing tasks. Students’ writing was assessed through pre- and post-tests in terms of argumentation quality (claims, counterarguments, and rebuttals) and language use, including syntactic complexity, grammatical accuracy, and fluency. The results showed that EFL students in the blended learning group made significant improvements in both argumentation quality and all aspects of language use. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two instructional environments in overall argumentation quality or most language measures, except for dependent clauses per clause, where the face-to-face group performed better. These findings suggest that both blended and face-to-face environments can effectively support EFL students’ argumentative writing development, although their effects may differ across specific aspects of language use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrot, J., & Gabinete, M. K. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012

Chen, W. (2016). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw075

Elabdali, R. (2021). Are two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2 learning benefits of collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, Article 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100788

Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x

Granado-Peinado, M., Mateos, M., Martín, E., & Cuevas, I. (2019). Teaching to write collaborative argumentative syntheses in higher education. Reading and Writing, 32(8), 2037–2058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09939-6

Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, Article 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666

Hemberger, L., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., & Shi, Y. (2017). A dialogic path to evidence-based argumentative writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336714

Jin, T., Su, Y., & Lei, J. (2020). Exploring the blended learning design for argumentative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 23–34. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44720

Kim, Y. J., & Emeliyanova, L. (2021). The effects of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of L2 writing: Comparing collaborative and individual revision behavior. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406

Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016b). Tracing the development of argumentative writing in a discourse-rich context. Written Communication, 33(1), 92–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315617157

Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 97–118. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44583

Landrieu, Y., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & De Wever, B. (2022). Assessing the quality of argumentative texts: Examining the general agreement between different rating procedures and exploring inferences of (dis)agreement cases. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 784261. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.784261

Larrain, A., Singer, V., Strasser, K., Howe, C., López, P., Pinochet, J., Moran, C., Sánchez, Á., Silva, M., & Villavicencio, C. (2021). Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000619

Li, M., & Zhang, M. (2023). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 56(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000318

López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2

Matos, F. (2021). Collaborative writing as a bridge from peer discourse to individual argumentative writing. Reading and Writing, 34(5), 1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10117-2

McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W. (2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.010

McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2019). Comparing the effect of collaborative and individual prewriting on EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.003

Morris, J. A., Miller, B. W., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Lin, T.-J., Scott, T., Zhang, J., Sun, J., & Ma, S. (2018). Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001

Najjemba, J. L., & Cronjé, J. (2020). Engagement with and participation in online role-play collaborative arguments: A sociocultural perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.5.006

Nussbaum, E. M., & Putney, L. G. (2020). Learning to use benefit-cost arguments: A microgenetic study of argument-counterargument integration in an undergraduate seminar course. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000412

Papathomas, L., & Kuhn, D. (2017). Learning to argue via apprenticeship. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.013

Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effects of collaborative writing on students’ writing fluency: An efficient framework for collaborative writing. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363

Rapanta, C. (2021). Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404

Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to argue through dialogue: A review of instructional approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2

Shi, Y., Matos, F., & Kuhn, D. (2019). Dialog as a bridge to argumentative writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.04

Short, R. A., van Der Eb, M. Y., & McKay, S. R. (2020). Effect of productive discussion on written argumentation in earth science classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1712314

Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. (Amy). (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Multilingual Matters.

Su, Y., Liu, K., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2021). The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study. System, 98, Article 102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102471

Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2021). The effects of incorporating metacognitive strategies instruction into collaborative writing on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1982675

van Eemeren, F. H. (2018). Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Springer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wagner, C. J., Ossa Parra, M., & Proctor, C. P. (2017). The interplay between student-led discussions and argumentative writing. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.340

Zabihi, R., & Bayan, M. (2020). Are two voices better than one? Comparing aspects of text quality and authorial voice in paired and independent L2 writing. Written Communication, 37(4), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320939542

Published
2026-04-23
Section
Articles