Analisis Contoh dan Latihan bagi Topik Penambahan dan Penolakan dalam Buku Teks Matematik SJKC

  • Chien Yee Lim Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
  • Roslinda Rosli Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
Keywords: Buku teks matematik SJKC, contoh dan latihan, penambahan dan penolakan, aspek matematik, aspek kontekstual

Abstract

Buku teks matematik merupakan medium penting dalam pelaksanaan kurikulum dan merealisasikan matlamat Pendidikan Matematik. Akan tetapi, kajian analisis ciri-ciri contoh dan latihan bagi topik penambahan dan penolakan dalam buku teks matematik SJKC berdasarkan aspek matematik dan kontekstual masih kurang. Analisis ini bertujuan mengenal pasti kelebihan dan kelemahan terhadap contoh dan latihan bagi topik penambahan dan penolakan dalam buku teks matematik dan diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran kepada penyelidik, penerbit dan penulis buku teks untuk proses penambahbaikan yang akan datang. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa terdapat sejumlah 74 (56%) contoh dan 57 (44%) latihan penambahan, manakala bilangan contoh dan latihan penolakan adalah sama, iaitu 59 (50%) masing-masing. Analisis contoh dan latihan penambahan menunjukkan bahawa contoh satu langkah pengiraan Tahun Satu hingga Tahun Lima adalah lebih banyak daripada latihan satu langkah pengiraan. Tahap Satu mempunyai latihan satu langkah pengiraan yang lebih banyak, manakala Tahun Empat dan Lima mempunyai latihan lebih satu langkah pengiraan yang lebih banyak. Selain itu, Tahun Satu, Empat dan Lima hanya mempunyai contoh bergambar, bercerita atau berjadual. Tahap Satu mempunyai lebih banyak latihan dalam bentuk ayat matematik. Analisis contoh dan latihan penolakan menunjukkan bahawa Tahun Satu mempunyai contoh dan latihan satu langkah pengiraan paling banyak. Tahun Satu mempunyai contoh lebih satu langkah pengiraan yang paling banyak, manakala Tahun Lima mempunyai latihan lebih satu langkah pengiraan yang paling banyak. Contoh yang bergambar, bercerita atau berjadual adalah lebih banyak berbanding dengan latihan bergambar, bercerita atau berjadual bagi Tahun Satu hingga Empat, hanya Tahun Lima mempunyai bilangan contoh dan latihan bergambar, bercerita atau berjadual yang sama.

Statistics
Abstract views: 41 , PDF downloads: 34

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azriana Abdul Azis & Roslinda Rosli. (2021). Analisis aras kognitif bagi soalan dalam buku teks matematik Tahun 4 KSSR Semakan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.712

Abdullah, Y., Mahmud, R., Jalil, H.A., & Daud, S. M. (2016). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan operasi penambahan dan penolakan pecahan dalam kalangan murid Tahun Empat. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET), 1(1), 1-8.

Alabdulaziz, M., & Higgins, S. (2021). The compatibility of developed mathematics textbook content in Saudi Arabia with NCTM standards: A critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 461-482. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14226a

Aperar Singh, P., Mohd Yusoff, N., & Teoh, S. (2020). Content analysis of primary school mathematics textbooks and its relationship with pupils achievement. Asian Journal Of University Education, 16(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10286

Behnke Y. (2018) Textbook effects and efficacy. In: Fuchs E., Bock A. (eds) The palgrave handbook of textbook studies (pp. 383-396). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1_28

Bingolbali, E. (2020). An analysis of questions with multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes in mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1606949

Brehmer, D., Ryve, A., & Steenbrugge, H.V. (2016) Problem solving in Swedish mathematics textbooks for upper secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 577-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066427

Chang, C., & Silalahi, S. M. (2017). A review and content analysis of mathematics textbooks in educational research. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75, 235-251. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/17.75.235

Cheng, J. W., & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). Analisis domain kognitif bagi latihan dalam buku teks matematik Tahun 6. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i11.549.

Digital Educational Learning Inititative Malaysia. (2021). Buku teks digital. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/moe.edu.my/guru/buku-teks-digital

Dollah, M. U., Widjaja, W., Zabit, M., & Omar, T. Z. (2019). A comparison of values of progress conveyed in mathematics textbook in Malaysia and Australia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.92.179.188

Gracin,, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: A five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849

Hadar, L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: Mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 55, 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.002.

Ham, A.V., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140.

Ho, H. (2018). The characteristics of writing examples in the textbook of mathematics in China and Germany compare research: Take the fourth grade as an example [Master dissertation, Guizhou Normal University]. CNKI. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/ 10663-1018836564.nh.html

Hwang, S., Yeo, S., & Son, T. (2021). A comparative analysis of fraction addition and subtraction contents in the mathematics textbooks in the U.S. and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 511-521.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 1. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 2. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 3. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KPM.

Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom – the teachers' view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3-4), 129-156.

Lessani, A., Yunus, A., Tarmiz, R.B., & Mahmud, R. (2014). Investigating the content of mathematics textbook used in 8th grade in Malaysia based on content domain of TIMSS. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(9), 71-84.

Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749754

Lusiana, R., & Andari, T. (2019). Developing an algebra textbook based on problem solving to improve student' learning achievement. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.4906.

Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A study of errors and misconceptions in the learning of addition and subtraction of directed numbers in Grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671375

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Goh, S., & Cotter, K. (2016). TIMSS 2015 Encyclopedia: education policy and curriculum in Mathematics and Science. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/encyclopedia/

Ng, L. K., & Dindyal, J. (2016). Examples in the teaching of mathematics: teachers’ perceptions. In P. C. Toh., & B. Kaur (Eds.), Developing 21st century competencies in the mathematics classroom (pp. 189-212). Singapore.

Norberg, M. (2019). Potential for Meaning Making in Mathematics Textbooks. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 52-62.

Noriati A. R., Boon, P. Y., & Sharifah F. S. A. (2017). Murid dan Pembelajaran. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.

Norqvist, M. (2018). The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1340679

Pei, L., Shang, J., & Ma, Y. (2016). The comparative study of exercises in two versions of mathematics textbooks for Chinese elementary schools: A case study of number, addition and subtraction within 20. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 36(6), 68-75.

Reyhani, E., & Izadi, M. (2018). Comparative content analysis of mathematics textbooks taught to the First Grade students of elementary schools in Iran, Japan and America. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 10(3), 299-314.

Asyrani Abdul Samat & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). exploring teachers’ perceptions of primary school mathematics textbook. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 286-300.

Stará, J., & Krčmářová, T. (2015). How teachers reflect on textbook materials and how they utilise them. Internatioal Association for Research on Textbooks and Educational Media e-Journal, 6(3), 67-87.

Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z., & Abidin, M. (2018). A comparative analysis on cognitive domain for the malaysian primary four textbook series. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1273-1286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82625

Wang, Y. C. 2017. The research on classroom exercises using in the primary mathematical textbook: To PEP as an example [Master dissertation, College of Education, Central China Normal University]. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10511-1017251751.nh.html

Xia, K. 2017. Investigation of mathematics teachers in Changzhou and Wuxi City on understanding and using of the textbook examples [Master dissertation, Nanjing Normal University]. CNKI. http://61.181.120.82:8081/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename= 1020326117.nh&dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD2021

Yang, D., Chang, M., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2017). The study of addition and subtraction for two digit numbers in Grade One between Singapore and Taiwan. American Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1). 75-82. https://doi.org/10.20448/804.2.1.75.82.

Yang, Y. 2019. A comparative study of the example design in mathematics textbooks in Chinese and Singapore junior high schools: Taking Shanghai Education Version and New Express Mathematics Used in Singapore as an example [Master dissertation, Hunan Normal University]. CNKI. https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Dissertation/Article/10542-1019672528.nh.html

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9
Published
2021-09-10
How to Cite
Lim, C. Y. and Rosli, R. (2021) “Analisis Contoh dan Latihan bagi Topik Penambahan dan Penolakan dalam Buku Teks Matematik SJKC”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(9), pp. 254 - 270. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.1008.
Section
Articles